[2023] KEBPRT 1148 (KLR)

[2023] KEBPRT 1148 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the Demand Notice dated 10/6/2023 issued by the Respondent was not in the prescribed statutory form (Form A) as required by Section 4(2) of the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act Cap 301 and the relevant Regulations. The notice was merely a letter and failed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEBPRT 1148 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Rose Kyalo; Respondent: John Nyambu
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E217 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction and Validity of Termination Notice
Outcome
Application allowed. Demand Notice declared null and void. Injunction granted against Respondent. Costs awarded to Applicant.
Judges
M Makori
Legal Topics
Controlled Tenancy, Termination Notice Requirements, Landlord Tenant Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Controlled Tenancy Termination Notice Requirements Landlord Tenant Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rose Kyalo

Applicant

John Nyambu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction and Validity of Termination Notice

  1. 1 Whether the Demand Notice dated 10/6/2023 issued by the Respondent is legally valid and enforceable under the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act.
  2. 2 What are the appropriate orders regarding the Applicant's continued occupation and the Respondent's conduct.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the Demand Notice dated 10/6/2023 issued by the Respondent was not in the prescribed statutory form (Form A) as required by Section 4(2) of the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act Cap 301 and the relevant Regulations. The notice was merely a letter and failed to specify the premises, duration, grounds for termination, and the requirement for the tenant to respond in writing within one month. The Tribunal emphasized that compliance with the statutory form and notice period is mandatory for the lawful termination of a controlled tenancy. As the Respondent's notice did not meet these requirements, it was declared null and void....

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Demand Notice declared null and void. Injunction granted against Respondent. Costs awarded to Applicant.

Orders

  • The Demand Notice dated 10/6/2023 is declared null and void pursuant to Section 4 of the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act Cap 301.
  • The Respondent, his servants, agents or any other persons acting on his behalf are restrained from evicting, closing or interfering with the Applicant’s quiet enjoyment of the subject property subject to payment of agreed rent.