[2014] KEHC 6047 (KLR)
The court found that the Petitioner had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that the marriage between herself and the Respondent had not been consummated, as the Respondent relocated abroad shortly after the marriage and had not returned. The parties had not lived together as husband and wife for over ten years....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 6047 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: L W K; Respondent: G K
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 221 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; marriage annulled and dissolved
- Judges
- LK Kimaru
- Legal Topics
- Marriage Annulment, Non Consummation, Divorce Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L W K
Petitioner
G K
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage between the Petitioner and the Respondent should be annulled on the ground of non-consummation.
- 2 Whether the Petitioner has proved her case to the required standard for dissolution of marriage.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Petitioner had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that the marriage between herself and the Respondent had not been consummated, as the Respondent relocated abroad shortly after the marriage and had not returned. The parties had not lived together as husband and wife for over ten years. The court held that non-consummation is a valid ground for annulment under the Marriage Act. As the Respondent did not contest the petition, and the evidence was unchallenged, the court concluded that the marriage should be annulled and dissolved.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; marriage annulled and dissolved
Orders
- The marriage celebrated between the Petitioner and the Respondent on 26th June 2001 at the Registrar’s Office in Nairobi is hereby annulled and dissolved.
- Decree nisi is hereby issued and shall be made absolute within thirty (30) days of the date of delivery of this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
13 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
DIVORCE CAUSE NO. 221 OF 2012
L W K…………..….........…………………………………………..PETITIONER
VERSUS
G K………….….….……………...…………………………………..RESPONDENT
J U D G M E N T
The Petitioner and the Respondent were on 26th June 2001 married at the Registrar’s Office in Nairobi. The marriage was celebrated under the Marriage Act. Prior to the said marriage the Petitioner had a child from a previous relationship. According to the Petitioner, since the celebration of the said marriage, the marriage has not been consummated. The Petitioner states that the Respondent traveled to the United States of America shortly after marriage and had not returned since. She averred that she has not lived with the Respondent since the celebration of the marriage. The Petitioner states that she has moved on and has children from another relationship. In the premises therefore, the Petitioner prays that the marriage be dissolved.
The Respondent was served with a copy of the petition for divorce together with notice requiring him to enter appearance. He did not enter appearance. Neither did he file an answer to the petition. The Deputy Registrar of this court issued a certificate certifying that this was a suitable cause to be disposed of as an undefended divorce cause. At the hearing of the petition, this court heard oral evidence adduced by the Petitioner. The Petitioner reiterated the contents of her petition for divorce. She told the court that the marriage was not consummated because the Respondent relocated to the United States of America shortly after the celebration of the marriage. He had not returned since. This court has carefully considered the grounds put forward by the Petitioner in support of her petition for divorce. That ground is of nullity. This court holds that the Petitioner did indeed prove to the required standard of proof on a balance of probabilities that indeed her marriage to the Respondent should be declared a nullity and be dissolved by reason of non-consummation of the marriage. The Petitioner and the Respondent have not related as husband and wife for a period of more than ten (10 years.
In the premises therefore, the marriage celebrated between the Petitioner and the Respondent on 26th June 2001 at the Registrar’s Office in Nairobi is hereby annulled. It is dissolved. Decree nisi is hereby issued. It shall be made absolute within thirty (30) days of the date of delivery of this judgment. There shall be no orders as to costs.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2014
L. KIMARU
JUDGE