[2022] KEELC 14820 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent had not provided any valid reason to prevent execution of the decree, as no stay of execution had been granted or served upon the court. The mere pendency of an appeal does not automatically stay execution. The court relied on statutory provisions allowing the Land Registrar to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEELC 14820 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Julius Kailikia Laaru; Respondent: Peter Kaigera Laaru
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Appeal 32 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Post Judgment Application for Implementation of Decree
- Outcome
- Application allowed.
- Judges
- CK Nzili
- Legal Topics
- Execution of Decree, Land Registration, Title Deeds, Court Orders Implementation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Julius Kailikia Laaru
Appellant
Peter Kaigera Laaru
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Post Judgment Application for Implementation of Decree
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should authorize the Land Registrar to dispense with the original title deed for LR No Tigania/Kitharene/419 to implement the decree.
- 2 Whether the respondent's opposition based on pending appeal and stay application justifies refusal to implement the decree.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent had not provided any valid reason to prevent execution of the decree, as no stay of execution had been granted or served upon the court. The mere pendency of an appeal does not automatically stay execution. The court relied on statutory provisions allowing the Land Registrar to dispense with the production of the original title deed and the court's own power to intervene to ensure implementation of its orders. The interests of justice required that the decree be implemented, and the respondent's non-cooperation could not frustrate the lawful process. Therefore, the application to authorize the Land Registrar to proceed without the original title deed...
Court Disposition
Application allowed.
Orders
- The sub county land registrar Tigania sub county is authorized to dispense with the original title deed for LR No Tigania/Kitharene/419 for the purposes of implementing the decree issued on May 23, 2022.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Laaru v Laaru (Environment and Land Appeal 32 of 2019) [2022] KEELC 14820 (KLR) (16 November 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEELC 14820 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Meru
Environment and Land Appeal 32 of 2019
CK Nzili, J
November 16, 2022
Between
Julius Kailikia Laaru
Appellant
and
Peter Kaigera Laaru
Respondent
(Being an Appeal from the judgment of Hon. G. Wakahiu (CM) delivered in Maua Law Courts on 27. 12. 2018 in CMCC NO. 7 of 2001)
Ruling
1. By an application dated August 3, 2022, the applicant seeks that the court authorizes or directs the sub county land registrar Tigania sub county to dispense with the original title deed for LR No Tigania/Kitharene/419 for the purposes of implementing the decree issued on May 23, 2022.
2. The application is supported by the affidavit of Julius Kailikia Laaru sworn on the even date. The grounds of the application are that the respondent has refused to cooperate in the implementation of the decree by surrendering the original title deed despite the survey and subdivision work having been done to curve out the ten acres off the original land as directed by the court.
3. The respondent has opposed the application through his replying affidavit sworn on May 31, 2022. He says that he has appealed against the decision and sought for stay of execution in Nyeri Court of Appeal Civil Application No. 4 of 2022 dated January 28, 2022. That he is in occupation of the suit land alongside his family, which is his only source of income and that the applicant has his own land elsewhere. That if the execution ensues he will be rendered a vagabond. That the land survey left a trail of destruction while establishing a boundary. That it was only fair and in the interest of justice to maintain the status quo.
4. Section 31 (1) of the Land Registration Act allows the Land Registrar to dispense with the production of a certificate of title to land or lease during the registration of any dealing with the land or lease upon an application to him by a party.
5. Under section 86 (1) of the Land Registration Act, the court can intervene if a question arises with regard to the exercise of any power or performance of any duty conferred or imposed on the Land Registrar by the Act, upon an application by either the Registrar or the aggrieved party.
6. By a ruling delivered on May 11, 2022, the court allowed the Deputy Registrar to sign the subdivisions and transfer for and on behalf of the judgment debtor, said to be uncooperative. To date, no stay of execution orders have been served upon this court. The respondent has not given any reasons why execution should not be issued. Pendency of an appeal does not amount to stay of execution. Even if the appeal was to succeed the entries to the records and the title deed can still be cancelled and or be recalled.
7. Therefore, I find it is in the interest of justice to allow the application sought with no orders as to costs.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS/OPEN COURT THIS 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022In presence of:C/A: KananuGitonga for appellantApplicantKaume for respondentHON. C.K. NZILIELC JUDGE