[2017] KEELC 1739 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 1739 (KLR)

The court found that the application for dismissal of the appeal was premature because the last action in the matter had occurred less than a year before the application was filed, and a pending application for stay of execution was yet to be determined. The court held that the delay was not inordinate or...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 1739 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Laban Muasya; Respondent: Christine Ngonyi Kiendi
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 176 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Dismissal of Appeal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Appeal Procedure, Stay of Execution, Case Management
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Appeal Procedure Stay of Execution Case Management

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Laban Muasya

Appellant

Christine Ngonyi Kiendi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Dismissal of Appeal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.
  2. 2 Whether the application for dismissal was filed prematurely.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for dismissal of the appeal was premature because the last action in the matter had occurred less than a year before the application was filed, and a pending application for stay of execution was yet to be determined. The court held that the delay was not inordinate or inexcusable, and that the respondent's application for dismissal did not meet the threshold for want of prosecution. Consequently, the application was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 20th May, 2011 for dismissal of the appeal is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.