[2009] KEHC 999 (KLR)

[2009] KEHC 999 (KLR)

The court found that the affidavit of service by the process server was clear and truthful, and the applicant failed to challenge it by cross-examination or by calling any of the persons named in the affidavit. The applicant's own draft defence acknowledged a settlement agreement and the agreed sum, which...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] KEHC 999 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Labh Singh Harmnam Singh Ltd; Defendant: Ahmed Salim Ahmed Jeizan
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 274 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Default Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Judgment, Service of Process, Default Judgment, Leave to Defend
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Setting Aside Judgment Service of Process Default Judgment Leave to Defend

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Labh Singh Harmnam Singh Ltd

Plaintiff

Ahmed Salim Ahmed Jeizan

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Default Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the judgment entered against the defendant should be set aside for lack of service of summons.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant should be granted leave to defend the suit.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff breached a settlement agreement by adding extraneous charges and interest.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the affidavit of service by the process server was clear and truthful, and the applicant failed to challenge it by cross-examination or by calling any of the persons named in the affidavit. The applicant's own draft defence acknowledged a settlement agreement and the agreed sum, which corresponded with the plaintiff's account. There was no sufficient basis to set aside the default judgment, as the applicant did not demonstrate lack of service or a meritorious defence. Accordingly, the application to set aside the judgment was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application to set aside the judgment is dismissed with costs.