[2021] KEHC 4791 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 4791 (KLR)

The court declined to proceed with the enforcement application because the applicant had not filed a certified copy of the arbitral award as required under Section 36 of the Arbitration Act. Compliance with statutory requirements is mandatory before the court can consider an application for enforcement of an...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 4791 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Lalji Meghji Patel & Company Limited; Respondent: Kabete Dam Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E1128 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Directions Prior to Hearing of Enforcement Application
Outcome
Application not considered; directions issued for compliance with statutory requirements.
Judges
WA Okwany
Legal Topics
Arbitral Award Enforcement, Arbitration Act Section 36, Commercial Dispute Resolution
Source Language
en
Alternative Dispute Resolution Commercial and Corporate Arbitral Award Enforcement Arbitration Act Section 36 Commercial Dispute Resolution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lalji Meghji Patel & Company Limited

Applicant

Kabete Dam Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Directions Prior to Hearing of Enforcement Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has complied with the mandatory requirements for enforcement of an arbitral award under Section 36 of the Arbitration Act.
  2. 2 Whether the application for enforcement can proceed in the absence of a certified copy of the arbitral award.

Ratio Decidendi

The court declined to proceed with the enforcement application because the applicant had not filed a certified copy of the arbitral award as required under Section 36 of the Arbitration Act. Compliance with statutory requirements is mandatory before the court can consider an application for enforcement of an arbitral award. The absence of the certified award is a procedural defect that precludes the court from granting the orders sought at this stage. The court therefore directed the applicant to comply with the statutory requirement before the application could be considered on its merits.

Court Disposition

Application not considered; directions issued for compliance with statutory requirements.

Orders

  • Applicant to file a certified copy of the arbitral award in compliance with Section 36 of the Arbitration Act before the application can be considered.
  • Hearing scheduled for 27th October 2021.