[2018] KEHC 467 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant failed to provide a plausible or credible reason for the delay in prosecuting the appeal. The purported correspondences to the Executive Officer regarding the missing lower court file were not received in the court registry, casting doubt on their authenticity and the appellant's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 467 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Landmark Holdings Ltd; Respondent: Mwende Mwania
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 666 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed for want of prosecution
- Judges
- LM Njuguna
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Dismissal, Want of Prosecution, Record of Appeal, Court Registry Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Landmark Holdings Ltd
Appellant
Mwende Mwania
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant has provided a plausible reason for failure to prosecute the appeal.
- 2 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant failed to provide a plausible or credible reason for the delay in prosecuting the appeal. The purported correspondences to the Executive Officer regarding the missing lower court file were not received in the court registry, casting doubt on their authenticity and the appellant's diligence. Furthermore, the court established that no record of appeal had been filed, contrary to the appellant's assertion. In the absence of satisfactory explanation for the delay and lack of evidence of genuine efforts to prosecute the appeal, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed for want of prosecution
Orders
- The appeal is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
CIVIL APPEAL NO.666 OF 2013
LANDMARK HOLDINGS LTD..........................APPELLANT
VERSUS
MWENDE MWANIA.........................................RESPONDENT
(Being an appeal from the judgment of Honourable Chief Magistrate Mrs. M. Murage
at Milimani Commercial Courts dated 11th December, 2013 in CMCC No. 6245 of 2009)
RULING
The Appeal herein was filed on the 20th day of December, 2013. On the 24th October, 2014, the Appellant/Applicant filed an application for stay pending the hearing and determination of the Appeal which was considered by Justice Onyancha and the Judge allowed the same on condition that the decretal sum was to be deposited in court. That ruling was delivered on the 5th November, 2014 and it’s the last time the matter was in court.
The Appeal was listed on the 27th July, 2018 for notice to show cause on which date, counsel for the Appellant sought leave to file an affidavit in response to the same.
The court has considered the contents of the said affidavit sworn by Peter Kabue Thumi, Advocate sworn on the 28th September, 2018.
In the said affidavit, he deposes that the lower court file was misplaced and he has been having problems in its retrieval at the registry. That he has on diverse dates written letters to the Executive Officer seeking to know the position of the file but his efforts have borne no fruits as the file is still missing. He has annexed copies of the necessary correspondences to demonstrate his assertion. He avers that the Appellant is keen on prosecuting the Appeal and that he has already filed the Record of Appeal. That it would be in the interest of justice that the Appellant is given a chance to prosecute its Appeal and the same be determined on merits.
The court has considered the contents of the aforesaid affidavit. I have also perused the Record of the proceedings. I first wish to note that no Record of Appeal has been filed in this Appeal. The court has looked at the letters addressed to the Executive Officer enquiring about the missing court file. All those letters were not received in the court registry and it is not possible for this court to know if the letters were done on the alleged dates or at all. The first letter is dated 20th April, 2014 in which Counsel for the Appellant seems to register his profound disappointment and concern regarding the absence of the court file from the registry. That letter just like with all the others was not received in the court registry and its doubtful if these letters found their way to the court registry.
I find that the reason given by the Appellant for his failure to prosecute the Appeal is not plausible. The Appeal is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Nairobi this 15thday of November, 2018
L. NJUGUNA
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
....................... For the Appellant
..................... For the Respondent