[2017] KEELC 1797 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 1797 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his claim of having loaned money to the late Kevin Mwamuye Jilani or that there were instructions for the transfer of the suit property to him. The documentation provided was inconclusive, and neither party could satisfactorily...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 1797 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Lanfrancus Wasi Birya T/A Bii Enterprises; Defendant: Joel Ngala Jilani; Defendant: Charo Kennedy Kazungu; Defendant: The Attorney General; Defendant: Chief Land Registrar
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 85 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Temporary Injunction
Outcome
Status quo order granted; costs in the cause.
Judges
JO Olola
Legal Topics
Injunctive Relief, Land Title Disputes, Transfer of Land, Possession and Occupation
Source Language
en
Land and Property Injunctive Relief Land Title Disputes Transfer of Land Possession and Occupation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lanfrancus Wasi Birya T/A Bii Enterprises

Plaintiff

Joel Ngala Jilani

Defendant

Charo Kennedy Kazungu

Defendant

The Attorney General

Defendant

Chief Land Registrar

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Temporary Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff has established a prima facie case with a probability of success to warrant the grant of a temporary injunction.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff will suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether the balance of convenience lies in preserving the status quo pending determination of the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his claim of having loaned money to the late Kevin Mwamuye Jilani or that there were instructions for the transfer of the suit property to him. The documentation provided was inconclusive, and neither party could satisfactorily explain the delay in transferring the title after Kevin's death. Given the uncertainty regarding possession and the status of the title, the court determined that it was in the interest of justice to preserve the suit property pending the hearing and determination of the main suit. Accordingly, the court ordered that the status quo be maintained to prevent any further dealings with...

Court Disposition

Status quo order granted; costs in the cause.

Orders

  • The status quo obtaining as of the date of the ruling in regard to subdivision No Group V/605 (Original No. 507/98) with Land Survey No. 248358 being CR 39322/1 shall be maintained until the suit is heard and determined.
  • The costs of the application shall be in the cause.