[2017] KEELC 3182 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie case that the interested parties/respondents were aware of the court orders issued on 30th October 2014 and 22nd January 2015, which directed both parties to maintain peace and the status quo on the suit land. The court noted that the orders were made...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 3182 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Lantei Ole Kiserian; Respondent: The District Land Registrar Kajiado; Respondent: The Honourable Attorney General; Respondent: The Nkama Group Ranch Limited; Respondent: Joseph Moisasi; Respondent: David Koin Tooika; Respondent: Partimo Ole Moisasi
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kajiado
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 5 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Commence Contempt Proceedings
- Outcome
- leave to commence contempt proceedings granted
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Status Quo Orders, Land Disputes, Enforcement of Court Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lantei Ole Kiserian
Applicant
The District Land Registrar Kajiado
Respondent
The Honourable Attorney General
Respondent
The Nkama Group Ranch Limited
Respondent
Joseph Moisasi
Respondent
David Koin Tooika
Respondent
Partimo Ole Moisasi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Commence Contempt Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the interested parties/respondents were in contempt of court orders issued on 30th October 2014 and 22nd January 2015.
- 2 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to commence contempt of court proceedings against the interested parties/respondents.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie case that the interested parties/respondents were aware of the court orders issued on 30th October 2014 and 22nd January 2015, which directed both parties to maintain peace and the status quo on the suit land. The court noted that the orders were made in the presence of both parties and that the applicant had provided evidence of alleged violations by the interested parties/respondents. The court determined that the threshold for granting leave to commence contempt proceedings had been met, as the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant further inquiry into the alleged disobedience. Accordingly, the court...
Court Disposition
leave to commence contempt proceedings granted
Orders
- Leave is granted to the ex parte applicant to commence contempt proceedings against Joseph Moisasi, David Koin Topoika, and Partimo Ole Moisasi within 14 days from the date hereof.
- Costs to be in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
44 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT KAJIADO
ELC CASE NUMBER 5 OF 2017
(formerly Machakos ELC PETITION No. 26 of 2014)
IN THE MATTER OF : ALLEGED CONTRAVENTION OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOM UNDER ARTICLE 20(1), 21(1), 10, 40, 50 AND 64 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA 2010;
AND
IN THE MATTER OF : THE REGISTRATION LAND ACT CAP 300(Now Repealed)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF: THE LAND REGISTRATION ACT, 2012 AND THE LAND ACT 2012;
AND
IN THE MATTER OF: THE LAND TITLE KAJIADO/KAPUTIEI-SOUTH/1915;
BETWEEN
LANTEI OLE KISERIAN...............................................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE DISTRICT LAND REGISTRAR KAJIADO...........................1ST RESPONDENT
THE HONOURABLE ATTORNEY GENERAL...............................2ND RESPONDENT
THE NKAMA GROUP RANCH LIMITED ...................................3RD RESPONDENT
AND
JOSEPH MOISASI....................................................................1ST INTERESTED PARTY
DAVID KOIN TOOIKA...............................................................2ND INTERESTED PARTY
PARTIMO OLE MOISASI ........................................................3RD INTERESTED PARTY
IN THE MATTER OF: Sections 5 of the Judicature Act Cap 8 Laws of Kenya
IN THE MATTER OF: Order 52 Rule 2 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of England
IN THE MATTER OF: Disobedience of a Court Order made by this Honourable Court on 30th October 2014 and 22nd January, 2015
IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by LANTEI OLE KISERIAN for leave to apply or an Order for Committal for Contempt of Court against
i. Joseph Moisasi
ii. David Koin Topoika
iii. Partimo Ole Moisasi
RULING
By a Chamber Summons dated 1st March 2017 and filed on 3rd March , 2017 and brought under Order 53 Rule 2(3) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of England, as well as Section 1A, 1B, 3, 3A, 63(e) of the Civil Procedure Act Cap 21 and Section 5(1) of the Judicature Act Cap 8, the ex parte applicant is seeking the following orders:
1. THATthis Application be certified urgent and service of the same be dispensed with.
2. THAT leave be granted to the Applicant to commence contempt of Court proceedings against Joseph Moisasi, David Koin Topoika and Artimp Ole Moisasi; the interested parties for disobeying this Honourable Court's orders issued on 30th October 2014 and 22nd January 2015.
3. THATthe costs of this application be provided for.
The application is supported by the grounds that the interested parties/petitioners herein Joseph Moisasi, David Koin Topoika and Partimo Ole Moisasi are in contempt of the court orders dated 30th October, 2014 and 22nd January, 2015 where the Honourable Judge directed that both parties maintain peace and status quo.
The application is supported by the verifying affidavit of Lantei Ole Kiserian where he outlines the history of the suit and avers that on 30th October, 2014 his petition was consolidated with petition number 24 of 2014 filed by the interested parties/respondents herein Joseph Moisasi, David Koin Topoika and Partimo Ole Moisasi. He states that the Honourable Judge directed both parties to maintain peace and the status quo subsisting prior to the filing of the two petitions be maintained until the matter was heard and disposed of. Further that on 22nd January 2015 the Court further reiterated the order of status quo. That the pronouncement of the order by the Judge was in the presence of both parties to the suit. The applicant avers that the respondents have arrogantly and capriciously violated the Court order and have engaged in constant intimidation against the applicant and his family. They have dug a well, cut down trees, allowed sand harvest at an adjacent river etc. He has reported the matter to the local police and provincial administration but they refused to act claiming the order for maintaining status quo was vague. He says the interested parties/ respondents persist in the reckless behaviour of defying the court order.
Mr. Aunga for the applicant maintained that the interested parties/respondents have continued to be reckless and harass the applicant and interfere with his peaceful occupation of the land. I have perused the court file, annexed documents and heard Mr. Aunga's arguments. I note from the court file that the parties were represented in court whenever the order of status quo was extended by the Honourable Judge on the 30th October, 2014 and 22nd January, 2015 respectively.
I hereby grant leave to the ex parte applicant to commence contempt proceeding against the interested parties/respondents herein Joseph Moisasi, David Koin Topoika and Partimo Ole Moisasi within 14 days from the date hereof.
Costs to be in cause.
Dated and delivered at Kajiado this 10th day of April 2017
CHRISTINE OCHIENG
JUDGE
Representation.
Mr. Onindo holding brief for Mr. Mwema Kitulu for applicant.
Court Assistant –Mpoye