[2021] KEHC 6789 (KLR)
The court found that there was no ruling delivered by the magistrate on 18th February 2021, but only directions which the applicants had not complied with. As there was no substantive decision or ruling, there was nothing for the High Court to grant leave to appeal against. The application was therefore an abuse of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 6789 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Laureen Omondi Sheen; Applicant: John Okwanyo Ogy; Applicant: Directline Insurance Co; Respondent: Salim Omme Abdulkhalik
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application E086 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay and Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Leave to Appeal, Abuse of Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Laureen Omondi Sheen
Applicant
John Okwanyo Ogy
Applicant
Directline Insurance Co
Applicant
Salim Omme Abdulkhalik
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay and Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to stay of proceedings and execution pending appeal.
- 2 Whether leave to appeal against the alleged ruling of the magistrate's court should be granted.
- 3 Whether there exists a ruling capable of being appealed against.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there was no ruling delivered by the magistrate on 18th February 2021, but only directions which the applicants had not complied with. As there was no substantive decision or ruling, there was nothing for the High Court to grant leave to appeal against. The application was therefore an abuse of the court process, and the applicants were directed to return to the magistrate's court to prosecute their pending application. The application was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application dated 26th February 2021 is dismissed with costs.
- Applicants are directed to prosecute their pending application before the magistrate's court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. E086 OF 2021
LAUREEN OMONDI SHEEN..................1ST DECREE DEBTOR/APPLICANT
JOHN OKWANYO OGY..........................2ND DECREE DEBTOR/APPLICANT
DIRECTLINE INSURANCE CO............3RD DECREE DEBTOR/APPLICANT
VERSUS
SALIM OMME ABDULKHALIK.............DECREE HOLDER/RESPONDENT
RULING
1. This is the notice of motion dated 26th February 2021 where the applicants are seeking the following orders:
(1) THAT this application be certified urgent, service thereof be dispensed with in the first instance and the same be heard exparte.
(2) THAT this Honourable court be pleased to stay any further proceedings in the matter Milimani Chief Magistrate’s Court Civil Case No. 1980 of 2013 and in particular the imminent attachment and sale of the 3rd Applicant’s proclaimed goods pending the hearing and determination of this Application.
(3) THAT this Honourable Court be pleased to grant the Applicant leave to appeal against the Ruling of Hon. M. W. Murage (Ms), Senior Resident Magistrate delivered on 15th February 2021 in Milimani Chief Magistrate’s Court Civil Case No. 1980 of 2013.
(4) THAT this Honourable court be pleased to stay any further proceedings in the matter Milimani Chief Magistrate’s Court Civil Case No. 1980 of 2013 and in particular execution of the decree pending the hearing and determination of the Applicant’s intended appeal.
(5) THAT the costs of this Application be in the cause.
(6) Any other and/or further orders that this Honourable Court deems fit to grant.
2. The application is premised on the grounds on the face of the application plus the sworn affidavit of Kevin Ngure which is from paragraph 9 – 25. The first 8 paragraphs are missing. The applicants claim that the respondent obtained a judgment in Milimani Chief Magistrate’s Civil Case No. 1980 of 2013 against the 1st and 2nd applicants on 5th February 2020. He has however proceeded to proclaim the 3rd applicant’s personal goods. From the grounds and affidavit the applicants are referring to an application dated 15th February 2021 which they filed before the trial court, under certificate of urgency.
3. The duty magistrate (Hon. M. W. Murage (M/s) certified the application urgent and gave an interpartes hearing date for 4th March 2021 and declined to issue temporary stay orders.
4. It is the “Ruling” denying them stay orders that they are seeking leave to appeal against.
5. The respondent has not filed any response to this application despite being given several opportunities by this court.
6. On perusal of the notice of motion dated 26th February 2021 I noted that the applicants did not annex a copy of the impugned “Ruling”. I therefore called for the lower court file (Milimani CMCC No. 1980 of 2013) which was promptly availed. Upon perusal of the file I have noted the following:
(i) The 1st and 2nd applicants filed before that court an application dated 18th February 2021 seeking stay of execution.
(ii) The matter was placed before the duty magistrate on 19th February 2021 for directions which were given.
(iii) On 4th March 2021 when the application was to be heard interpartes none of the parties was present. Nothing has proceeded on the said application to date.
7. The applicants obtained exparte stay orders before this court on 3rd March 2021. The same have remained in force until now.
8. It is very clear from the record that there is no Ruling that was delivered by M. W. Murage Resident Magistrate on 18th February 2021. What were given were clear directions, which have not been complied with by the applicants.
9. There is nothing to appeal against for this court to grant the leave sought. This is a clear abuse of the court process. The applicants are directed to go back to the Magistrate’s court and prosecute their pending application.
10. The application dated 26th February 2021 is dismissed with costs.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 24TH DAY OF MAY 2021 AT NAIROBI.
H. I. ONG’UDI
JUDGE