[2013] KEHC 3095 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 3095 (KLR)

The court found that the petition raises substantial constitutional questions regarding the separation of powers, the independence of constitutional commissions, and the rule of law. The court held that there is a real and imminent risk of prejudice to the public interest and the constitutional order if the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 3095 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Law Society of Kenya; Respondent: National Assembly of the Republic of Kenya; Respondent: Parliamentary Service Commission; Respondent: Speaker of the National Assembly; Respondent: Attorney General; Respondent: Salaries and Remuneration Commission; Respondent: Controller of Budget
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 281 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Ex Parte Conservatory Orders
Outcome
Conservatory orders granted; petition and application certified as urgent.
Judges
DAS Majanja
Legal Topics
Separation of Powers, Independence of Commissions, Remuneration of State Officers, Judicial Review of Legislative Action
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Administrative Law Separation of Powers Independence of Commissions Remuneration of State Officers Judicial Review of Legislative Action

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Law Society of Kenya

Applicant

National Assembly of the Republic of Kenya

Respondent

Parliamentary Service Commission

Respondent

Speaker of the National Assembly

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Salaries and Remuneration Commission

Respondent

Controller of Budget

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Ex Parte Conservatory Orders

  1. 1 Whether the National Assembly has the constitutional mandate to nullify Gazette Notices issued by the Salaries and Remuneration Commission.
  2. 2 Whether the actions of the National Assembly violate the principle of separation of powers and the independence of constitutional commissions.
  3. 3 Whether conservatory orders should issue to restrain implementation of the Certificate of Nullification pending hearing and determination of the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the petition raises substantial constitutional questions regarding the separation of powers, the independence of constitutional commissions, and the rule of law. The court held that there is a real and imminent risk of prejudice to the public interest and the constitutional order if the Certificate of Nullification issued by the National Assembly is implemented before the petition is heard and determined. The court emphasized the necessity of conservatory orders to preserve the status quo, prevent potential loss to public coffers, and protect the integrity of constitutional bodies and processes. The court concluded that the balance of convenience and the public...

Court Disposition

Conservatory orders granted; petition and application certified as urgent.

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 30th May 2013 and the Petition are certified as urgent.
  • A conservatory order is issued restraining all State organs, Commissions, independent offices, State and public officers and any person from implementing, enforcing or acting upon the Certificate of Nullification of Gazette Notices No. 2885, 2886, 2887 and 2888 issued by the Salaries and Remuneration Commission...