[2016] KEHC 1485 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 1485 (KLR)

Despite the defendant's failure to file the additional witness statement earlier and the lack of a satisfactory explanation for the delay, the court found that, in the interest of justice and pursuant to Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution, the defendant should be granted leave to file the statement. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 1485 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Lawrence C. Njeru; Defendant: Hon. Danson Buya Mungatana
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 343 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Call Additional Defence Witness After Close of Plaintiff's Case
Outcome
Application for leave to call additional defence witness granted.
Judges
LM Njuguna
Legal Topics
Leave to Call Additional Witness, Pre Trial Compliance, Late Filing of Witness Statements
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Leave to Call Additional Witness Pre Trial Compliance Late Filing of Witness Statements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lawrence C. Njeru

Plaintiff

Hon. Danson Buya Mungatana

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Call Additional Defence Witness After Close of Plaintiff's Case

  1. 1 Whether the defendant should be granted leave to call an additional witness after the close of the plaintiff's case.
  2. 2 Whether the late introduction of the witness prejudices the plaintiff or amounts to an abuse of court process.

Ratio Decidendi

Despite the defendant's failure to file the additional witness statement earlier and the lack of a satisfactory explanation for the delay, the court found that, in the interest of justice and pursuant to Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution, the defendant should be granted leave to file the statement. The court emphasized that the plaintiff would not suffer prejudice as cross-examination would be allowed, and the overriding objective of the court is to facilitate substantive justice. The court also noted the defendant's participation in pre-trial procedures and the absence of any prior indication of intent to call the additional witness, but ultimately prioritized the need to determine...

Court Disposition

Application for leave to call additional defence witness granted.

Orders

  • The defendant is granted leave to file a witness statement for the additional witness within fourteen (14) days from the date of the ruling.