[2015] KEELRC 296 (KLR)
The court found that the dispute between the Claimant and Respondent was fully compromised and settled through a conciliation process at the Labour Office, resulting in an agreement to reduce the summary dismissal to normal termination and payment of notice and June 2013 wages. The Claimant's subsequent legal action...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEELRC 296 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Lawrence Echuu; Respondent: Green Park Water Services Ltd
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 279 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- claim dismissed
- Judges
- MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Termination, Conciliation Settlement, Contractual Entitlements, Public Policy in Employment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lawrence Echuu
Claimant
Green Park Water Services Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complaint of unfair termination of employment was compromised by conciliation and settlement.
- 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to further contractual or statutory payments after the conciliation agreement.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the dispute between the Claimant and Respondent was fully compromised and settled through a conciliation process at the Labour Office, resulting in an agreement to reduce the summary dismissal to normal termination and payment of notice and June 2013 wages. The Claimant's subsequent legal action was contrary to public policy, as it sought to reopen a matter already resolved by mutual agreement. The court further held that the Claimant failed to establish a contractual or statutory basis for additional claims such as house allowance, overtime, or severance pay, noting that he was already receiving house allowance and was not entitled to service pay due to his...
Court Disposition
claim dismissed
Orders
- The Memorandum of Claim filed on 3 July 2014 is dismissed.
- Each party shall bear its own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT NAKURU
CAUSE NO. 279 OF 2014
LAWRENCE ECHUU.......................................CLAIMANT
v
GREEN PARK WATER SERVICES LTD.......RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. Lawrence Echuu (Claimant) was summarily dismissed by Green Park Water Services Ltd (Respondent) through a letter dated 20 June 2013.
2. The Claimant was aggrieved and a complaint of unfair/unlawful termination of employment was made to the County Labour Officer, Naivasha. Conciliation meetings were subsequently held under a conciliator A.M. Karimi.
3. Officials of the Kenya Union of Commercial, Food and Allied Workers represented the Claimant during the conciliation process.
4. On 14 November 2013, a Certificate of Agreement was signed by the Claimant, A Mwangi and Jeremiah Waweru (union representatives) on the one side and 2 of the Respondent’s managers. The agreement was witnessed by the Conciliator.
5. A copy of the agreement produced in Court show that the parties agreed that the summary dismissal of the Claimant be reduced to normal termination and the Claimant be paid notice pay and wages for June 2013.
6. On 19 November 2013, the Respondent deposited Kshs 20,675/- with the County Labour Office and an acknowledgment was produced in Court. A Payment Agreement/Settlement produced indicate the Claimant collected Kshs 7,447/- on 18 December 2013.
7. Inspite of the agreement and settlement reached at conciliation, the Claimant commenced legal proceedings against the Respondent on 3 July 2014 and he stated the issue in dispute as unfair terminationof employment.
8. The Claimant sought a declaration that the termination of his services was unfair and payment of house allowance, overtime, notice pay and compensation for loss of employment.
9. The Respondent filed a Response on 6 October 2014 and the Cause was heard on 26 February 2015 and 2 June 2015. The Claimant did not file submissions within the agreed timelines while the Respondent filed its written submissions on 1 July 2015.
10. The Court has considered the pleadings, evidence and submissions. Because of the view the Court has taken of the matter, it is not necessary to discuss whether the dismissal of the Claimant was unfair.
11. The Court will only discuss the issue of whether the complaint of unfair termination of employment was compromised and contractual entitlements..
12. It is not disputed that the parties herein made a complaint to the local Labour office and a conciliator was appointed. The parties made representations before the conciliator and an agreement was reached to reduce the summary dismissal to normal termination of employment.
13. As a consequence of the agreement the Claimant was paid (it is not clear whether he was paid Kshs 20,675/- in total or not. He should seek any balances from the Labour Office, if at all).
14. But the fact remains that the complaint was mutually resolved by the parties.
15. In my view, although the primary labour statutes have not expressly barred employees from commencing legal proceedings where a dispute has been settled during conciliation, it is against public policy for a party to such settled or compromised employment dispute to commence legal proceedings on the same facts.
16. The Court also notes that the Claimant did not lay a contractual or statutory basis for the claim for house allowance, severance pay (applies in cases of redundancy) or for overtime or give a rough quantum thereof.
17. The Claimant’s pay slips show he was getting house allowance, and if by severance pay the Claimant meant service pay pursuant to section 35(5) of the Employment Act, 2007, he is not entitled to the same because he was a contributing member to the National Social Security Fund.
18. Considering the foregoing, the Memorandum of Claim filed in Court on 3 July 2014 is dismissed with an order that each party bears its own costs.
Delivered, dated and signed in Nakuru on this 6th day of November 2015.
Radido Stephen
Judge
Appearances
For Claimant Mr. Muthanwa instructed by Muthanwa & Co. Advocates
For Respondent Ms. Wachira instructed by G. V. Mumia & Co. Advocates
Court Assistant Nixon