[2017] KEELC 3411 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 3411 (KLR)

The court found that the Applicant is the registered proprietor of the suit land, South Wanga/Lureko/3297, as evidenced by the title deed and official search. The Respondents' claim is based on the assertion that the suit land was subdivided from their larger parcel, but this is a substantive issue for trial. Given...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 3411 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Lawrence G. Wanyama Osama; Defendant: Benedict Opata; Defendant: Wambani Were (suing on behalf of themselves and on behalf of Mumias Teacher Society)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 154 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Interlocutory Application for Temporary Injunction
Outcome
Temporary injunction granted; suit transferred to Kakamega Environment and Land Court; costs in the cause.
Legal Topics
Temporary Injunctions, Land Ownership Disputes, Title Registration, Boundary Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Temporary Injunctions Land Ownership Disputes Title Registration Boundary Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lawrence G. Wanyama Osama

Plaintiff

Benedict Opata

Defendant

Wambani Were (suing on behalf of themselves and on behalf of Mumias Teacher Society)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Interlocutory Application for Temporary Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff has established a prima facie case with a probability of success for temporary injunction orders to issue at the interlocutory stage.
  2. 2 What orders to issue.
  3. 3 Who pays the costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Applicant is the registered proprietor of the suit land, South Wanga/Lureko/3297, as evidenced by the title deed and official search. The Respondents' claim is based on the assertion that the suit land was subdivided from their larger parcel, but this is a substantive issue for trial. Given the ongoing construction by the Respondents, which could permanently alter the land, the court held that it is necessary to preserve the status quo by issuing a temporary injunction restraining further construction pending the hearing and determination of the suit. The court also determined that the matter falls within the jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court at...

Court Disposition

Temporary injunction granted; suit transferred to Kakamega Environment and Land Court; costs in the cause.

Orders

  • The Respondents by themselves or those claiming from them are hereby restrained from any further construction on land parcel South Wanga/Lureko/3297 pending hearing and determination of this suit.
  • The costs of the application be in the cause.