[2000] KEHC 336 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff, being the brother of the deceased, did not fall within the categories of beneficiaries entitled to bring a claim under the Fatal Accidents Act as stipulated by Section 4(1). Furthermore, the plaintiff failed to plead or prove dependency, did not provide evidence of the deceased's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2000] KEHC 336 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Lawrence Gaitho Mathenge; Defendant: Kenya Breweries Ltd.; Defendant: [Unnamed 2nd Defendant]
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 2113 of 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- suit dismissed with costs to the defendant
- Legal Topics
- Fatal Accidents Act, Dependency Claims, Negligence, Damages for Death
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lawrence Gaitho Mathenge
Plaintiff
Kenya Breweries Ltd.
Defendant
[Unnamed 2nd Defendant]
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff had legal standing to bring a claim under the Fatal Accidents Act.
- 2 Whether the deceased's dependants were properly pleaded and identified in the suit.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of dependency and income for damages.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff, being the brother of the deceased, did not fall within the categories of beneficiaries entitled to bring a claim under the Fatal Accidents Act as stipulated by Section 4(1). Furthermore, the plaintiff failed to plead or prove dependency, did not provide evidence of the deceased's income, and did not describe any dependants in the Plaint. The absence of letters of administration also rendered the Law Reform Act claim unsustainable. Consequently, the suit was dismissed as a non-starter for lack of legal standing and failure to meet statutory requirements.
Court Disposition
suit dismissed with costs to the defendant
Orders
- The suit is dismissed with costs to the defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CIVIL CASE NO. 2113 OF 1996
LAWRENCE GAITHO MATHENGE ........................... PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
KENYA BREWERIES LTD. & ANOTHER............... DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
This is a case whereby Michael Gathimba Maina (now deceased) was at a petrol station with PW2. A lorry belonging to the 1st defendant and driven by the 2nd defendant was so driven negligently, as it entered the petrol station, that it knocked down the deceased. He later died whilst admitted to hospital.
The deceased was aged 34 years old. He was unmarried. This suit was filed by his brother who prayed for damages under the Law Reform act and under the Fatal Accidents Act. The defence entered appearance and filed defence. They claimed that the plaintiff was negligence.
Before the trial began the advocate for the plaintiff conceded that there was no letters of administration taken out by the plaintiff prior to filing of the suit. He therefore withdrew the claim under the Law Reform Act.
As to the claim under the Fatal accident Act, the plaintiff stated that he was now 34 years. He appeared to be married. That the deceased would occasionally assist him pay for rent and food. That he was a labourer and did not have a steady income. Their father was deceased. No mention of their mother was made.
Unfortunately the advocate for the plaintiff failed to exchange his documents, if any that he had.
He then stated that the deceased was employed earning Ksh.8,000/-. No proof of this was given.
The advocate for the defendant claimed that there has been no where that the statute had been pleaded in the Plaint. Further no dependants were described.
Under the Fatal accidents Act Cap.32. It states under Section 4(1).
“Every action brought by virtue of the provisions of this act shall be for the benefit of the wife, husband, parent and child of the person whose death was so caused...........”
It therefore means that this case is a non-starter. The plaintiff does not fall under any of the said category.
I hereby dismiss this suit with costs to the defendant. (The plaintiff should have withdrawn this suit, applied for leave to file a suit out of time for good reasons. Join in their mother as dependant).
Dated this 24th day of February, 2000 at Nairobi.
M.A. ANG’AWA
JUDGE