[2019] KEELC 759 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 759 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had proved, through documentary evidence and corroborating witnesses, that he purchased and took possession of the 2 acres in question. The defendants did not challenge the plaintiff's ownership with any substantive evidence nor did they assert a competing claim to the land. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 759 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Lawrence P.B. Odunga; Defendant: Thomas Kandete; Defendant: Donald Masakari; Defendant: Elizabeth Akinyi; Defendant: Peter Nasasa
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 17 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Trespass to Land, Ownership Disputes, Eviction Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Tort Law Trespass to Land Ownership Disputes Eviction Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lawrence P.B. Odunga

Plaintiff

Thomas Kandete

Defendant

Donald Masakari

Defendant

Elizabeth Akinyi

Defendant

Peter Nasasa

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is the legal owner of the 2 acres comprised in land parcel no. 5777/3 Chepkorok Farm.
  2. 2 Whether the defendants unlawfully trespassed and occupied the plaintiff's land.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to eviction and a permanent injunction against the defendants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had proved, through documentary evidence and corroborating witnesses, that he purchased and took possession of the 2 acres in question. The defendants did not challenge the plaintiff's ownership with any substantive evidence nor did they assert a competing claim to the land. The court held that the absence of title issuance in Chepkorok Farm did not negate the plaintiff's proprietary rights acquired through purchase and possession. The defendants' occupation was found to be unlawful and amounted to trespass. Consequently, the plaintiff was entitled to a declaration of ownership, eviction of the defendants, and a permanent injunction restraining further...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Orders

  • Declaration that the plaintiff is entitled to the 2 acres comprised in land parcel No. 5777/3 Chepkorok to the exclusion of the defendants.
  • Order of eviction of the defendants from the 2 acres comprised in land parcel no. 5777/3 Chepkorok Farm.