[2016] KEHC 1442 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate that his appeal had overwhelming chances of success. The court also found that the appellant would not have served a large portion of his sentence before the appeal is heard, as the record of appeal was ready and the hearing could be scheduled promptly. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 1442 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Lawrence Rutere Muriuki; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 15 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Exceptional Circumstances, Overwhelming Chances of Success
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lawrence Rutere Muriuki
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant has demonstrated overwhelming chances of success in his appeal to warrant bail pending appeal.
- 2 Whether there exist exceptional or unusual circumstances justifying release on bail pending appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate that his appeal had overwhelming chances of success. The court also found that the appellant would not have served a large portion of his sentence before the appeal is heard, as the record of appeal was ready and the hearing could be scheduled promptly. The appellant's good character and lack of harm to society were not considered exceptional circumstances. Therefore, the application for bail pending appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The appellant's application for bail pending the hearing and determination of his appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 15 OF 2016
LAWRENCE RUTERE MURIUKI.......................APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC...................................................... RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The appellant through his notice of motion filed in court on 21st April 2016 brought an application for release on bail pending the hearing and determination of his appeal. The application is brought under certificate of urgency and was heard as such.
2. The appellant was convicted and sentenced to a fine of Kshs 100,000/- in addition to a sentence of imprisonment for five years by the court of the Resident Magistrate on 14th March 2016.
3. The application is supported by the grounds set out on the face of the notice of motion. Those grounds are as follows. First, the appellant has stated that he shall abide by all conditions which the court may impose in respect of his bail pending the hearing and determination of his appeal. Second, he has stated that he is physically disabled and the prison does not have facilities to provide for him as an inmate.
4. The appellant's application is anchored in his supporting affidavit. He has deponed that he was charged and convicted on the offence of trafficking in nacotic drugs contrary to section 4 (a) as read with section 2 (a) of Act No. 4 of 1994 and was sentenced to five years imprisonment. He has further stated that he has lodged an appeal, being High Court of Kenya at Embu, Criminal Appeal No. 15 of 2016 at Embu, which is yet to be heard. He has also deponed in the affidavit that his appeal has overwhelming chances of success. He has deponed that he will have served a large portion of his sentence before his appeal is heard and determined. Finally, he has deponed that he is a person of good character and will pose no harm to the society.
5. The law applicable in cases of bail pending appeal according to Somo v. R (1972) EA 476 is that the applicant has to demonstrate that his appeal has overwhelming chances of success. In the alternative if he fails in that regard he may also be granted bail if he shows that there are exceptional or unusual circumstances in his appeal.
6. The appellant is a married person with dependant minors. The appellant made oral submissions in court and submitted that his appeal has high chances of success.
7. I have considered the affidavit evidence of the appellant and his grounds in support of his application and I find that he has not demonstrated that his appeal has overwhelming chances of success. I find from his grounds in support of the application and his affidavit evidence that he will not have served a large portion of his sentence before this appeal is heard and determined. The reason being that the record of appeal is ready and the appeal may be fixed for hearing as soon as it is practicable. The fact that the appellant is a person of good character and poses no harm to the society are not exceptional circumstances to warrant his release on bail pending the hearing and determination of his appeal.
8. In the light of the foregoing matters I hereby dismiss the appellant's application for bail pending the hearing and determination of his appeal.
RULING DATED, SIGNEDand DELIVERED in open court at EMBU this13th day ofJUNE2016.
In the presence of both the applicant and Ms Mbae for the state
Court clerk R. Njue
J. M. BWONWONGA
JUDGE
13. 06. 16