[2018] KEELRC 2365 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant failed to prove, on a balance of probabilities, that he was entitled to the claimed dues. The assertion that he worked every day, including Sundays and public holidays, without a break was found to be implausible and unsupported by evidence. The claimant did not provide the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 2365 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Lazaro W. Wanyonyi; Respondent: Night Armour Security Services
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 1676 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Claim / Judgment
- Outcome
- claim dismissed
- Judges
- AN Makau, MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Termination, Minimum Wage, Overtime Pay, Leave Entitlement
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lazaro W. Wanyonyi
Claimant
Night Armour Security Services
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Claim / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unlawfully dismissed without notice contrary to Section 41 of the Employment Act.
- 2 Whether the claimant was underpaid below the gazetted minimum wage for security guards.
- 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation for overtime, leave, severance pay, and other terminal dues.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant failed to prove, on a balance of probabilities, that he was entitled to the claimed dues. The assertion that he worked every day, including Sundays and public holidays, without a break was found to be implausible and unsupported by evidence. The claimant did not provide the applicable wage rates to substantiate the claim of underpayment. As a result, the court dismissed the entire claim for lack of proof, holding that the burden of proof rested with the claimant, who failed to discharge it.
Court Disposition
claim dismissed
Orders
- The claimant's entire claim is dismissed.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT & LABOUR RELATIONS
COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
SUIT NO. 1676 OF 2014
LAZARO W. WANYONYI.....................................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
NIGHT ARMOUR SECURITY SERVICES.....................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. The Claimant filed his suit on 25th September 2014 and averred in the plaint that he was engaged as a security guard earning Kshs. 7,000/- which was below the gazetted minimum of Kshs. 12,548. 45. He averred that he performed his duties between 6. 00am and 6. 00pm daily including Sundays and public holidays. He averred that he was dismissed on 23rd April 2014 without any notice and that in his service, he was not given any leave or receive any leave allowance. He averred the dismissal was contrary to the provisions of the rules of natural justice and Section 41 of the Employment Act. He claimed salary for April 2014, one month salary in lieu of notice, annual leave, severance pay, 12 months salary compensation, underpayment, house allowance, overtime and public holidays and a certificate of service. The Claimant also sought costs of the suit and interest.
2. The suit was not defended and the case proceeded to hearing without any defence on record. The Claimant testified that he was employed as a guard in January 2013 and was paid Kshs. 7,000/- a month and that the assignment was in Lavington. He stated that he did not have any off days and worked on weekends and public holidays. He testified that he did not have a residential house provided and was not paid any house allowance. He was dismissed on 23rd April 2014 without notice and was not paid his dues. He testified that he was entitled to receive 12,000/- a month and not the 7,000/- he received as per the wages regulations.
3. In the claim before me, the Claimant asserts that he worked every day including Sundays and public holidays. This is difficult to imagine and therefore stretching the bounds of the indomitable human spirit. There is no way the Claimant worked from January 2013 till April 2014 without a break. The claim on work during Sundays and public holidays is dismissed. The Claimant earned Kshs. 7,000/- which he asserts is below the wage prescribed for a day watchman under the Regulation of Wages (Protective Security Services) Order. He has not provided the rates for a watchman/guard to show that he is entitled to more than the Kshs. 7,000/- he earned a month. In the final analysis the Claimant’s claim is dismissed as he did not prove the claim on a balance of probabilities. There is no order on costs.
It is so ordered.
Dated at Nairobi this 20th day of December 2017
NZIOKI WA MAKAU
JUDGE
Delivered at Nairobi this 17th day of January 2018
RADIDO STEPHEN
JUDGE