[2018] KEELRC 1526 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 1526 (KLR)

The court found that the claimants who were still in employment were not underpaid, as their wages met or exceeded the minimum rates prescribed by the applicable wage orders. The claims for underpayment were therefore dismissed. The court held that all claimants in service were entitled to annual leave or payment in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 1526 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Lazarus Sindani & 14 Others; Respondent: Jiangxi Zhongmei Engineering Construction Company Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 113 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Partly allowed; underpayment and overtime claims dismissed, annual leave granted.
Judges
DO Ogal, MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Underpayment of Wages, Overtime Entitlement, Annual Leave Entitlement, Statutory Deductions, House Allowance, Termination Benefits
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Underpayment of Wages Overtime Entitlement Annual Leave Entitlement Statutory Deductions House Allowance Termination Benefits

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lazarus Sindani & 14 Others

Applicant

Jiangxi Zhongmei Engineering Construction Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimants were underpaid their wages contrary to the applicable wage orders.
  2. 2 Whether the claimants are entitled to payment for lost hours/overtime.
  3. 3 Whether the claimants are entitled to annual leave or payment in lieu thereof.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimants who were still in employment were not underpaid, as their wages met or exceeded the minimum rates prescribed by the applicable wage orders. The claims for underpayment were therefore dismissed. The court held that all claimants in service were entitled to annual leave or payment in lieu thereof, as provided by Section 28 of the Employment Act, and directed the respondent to compute and pay all leave due up to the date of filing suit. The claim for pay in lieu of notice by the 3rd claimant was dismissed for lack of evidence regarding the circumstances of his termination. Claims for statutory deductions and house allowance were abandoned or not...

Court Disposition

Partly allowed; underpayment and overtime claims dismissed, annual leave granted.

Orders

  • The respondent is directed to compute and pay all claimants in lieu of all leave due up to 21st April 2015.
  • The claim for underpayment of wages is dismissed.