[2014] KEHC 4378 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 4378 (KLR)

The court found that the Petitioner, Leah Chelangat Tirop, obtained the grant of letters of administration by concealing material facts, specifically by failing to disclose all assets of the estate and by excluding members of the second house from the succession process. The allegations made by the Applicant were...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 4378 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joel Kiprono Kering; Respondent: Leah Chelangat Tirop
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 173 ‘B’ of 2002
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
grant of letters of administration revoked
Judges
JK Sergon
Legal Topics
Revocation of Grant, Non Disclosure of Assets, Succession Procedure, Estate Administration
Source Language
en
Family and Children Revocation of Grant Non Disclosure of Assets Succession Procedure Estate Administration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joel Kiprono Kering

Applicant

Leah Chelangat Tirop

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration was obtained by concealment of material facts.
  2. 2 Whether the Petitioner failed to disclose all assets of the estate.
  3. 3 Whether members of the second house were excluded from the succession process.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Petitioner, Leah Chelangat Tirop, obtained the grant of letters of administration by concealing material facts, specifically by failing to disclose all assets of the estate and by excluding members of the second house from the succession process. The allegations made by the Applicant were not controverted or responded to by the Petitioner, and the Respondent's advocate admitted to the non-disclosure of assets. The court held that these omissions constituted sufficient grounds for revocation of the grant under Section 76 of the Law of Succession Act. The request to revoke titles issued to a third-party purchaser was denied because the purchaser was not a party to...

Court Disposition

grant of letters of administration revoked

Orders

  • The grant of letters of administration made to Leah Chelangat Tirop on 30th June 2004 and confirmed on 12th May 2005 is revoked.
  • Each party shall bear their own costs.