[2018] KEELC 1221 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 1221 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had proved her case on a balance of probabilities. The plaintiff produced the original title deed showing her as the registered owner of the suit land, as well as documentary evidence of the defendant's trespass and failure to vacate despite demand. The defendant did not contest...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 1221 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Leah Chelulei Tele; Defendant: Gladys Mutonyi Simiyu
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Land Case 55 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff as prayed in the plaint.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Trespass to Land, Ownership Dispute, Permanent Injunction, Land Title, Possession Rights
Source Language
en
Land and Property Trespass to Land Ownership Dispute Permanent Injunction Land Title Possession Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leah Chelulei Tele

Plaintiff

Gladys Mutonyi Simiyu

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant is a trespasser on part of Land Parcel No. Kimondo/Kimondo Block 1/Kundos/75.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the suit land.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to costs and any other relief.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had proved her case on a balance of probabilities. The plaintiff produced the original title deed showing her as the registered owner of the suit land, as well as documentary evidence of the defendant's trespass and failure to vacate despite demand. The defendant did not contest the claim or appear in court. The court held that the plaintiff is entitled to a declaration that the defendant is a trespasser, a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the suit land, and costs of the suit. The judgment was entered as prayed in the plaint.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff as prayed in the plaint.

Orders

  • A declaration that the defendant is a trespasser on part of Land Parcel No. Kimondo/Kimondo Block 1/Kundos/75.
  • A permanent injunction restraining the defendant, her agents, servants, assigns, or any other person acting on her behalf from entering, alienating, invading, constructing, cultivating, leasing, trespassing on, selling, claiming, occupying, developing, or dealing in any manner with the plaintiff’s 0.15 of an acre or...