[2021] KEELC 451 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 451 (KLR)

The court found that there was a pending application for enjoinder seeking to consolidate this matter with others, but that application had not been prosecuted. Additionally, the respondents' preliminary objection seeking to strike out the suit was also pending. The court determined that it was currently seized of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 451 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Leah Ngendo Komu (Suing through the estate of Johnson Kamau Komu, Deceased); Respondent: Teresia W. Kirima & Ann W. Kirima (Administrators of the Estate of Gerishon K. Kirima); Respondent: John Gerishon Kirima
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case E342 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Interlocutory Ruling on Transfer and Consolidation Application
Outcome
Application for transfer declined; directions issued for simultaneous hearing of pending applications.
Judges
LN Mbugua
Legal Topics
Case Consolidation, Preliminary Objection, Enjoinder of Suits
Source Language
en
Land and Property Case Consolidation Preliminary Objection Enjoinder of Suits

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leah Ngendo Komu (Suing through the estate of Johnson Kamau Komu, Deceased)

Plaintiff

Teresia W. Kirima & Ann W. Kirima (Administrators of the Estate of Gerishon K. Kirima)

Respondent

John Gerishon Kirima

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Interlocutory Ruling on Transfer and Consolidation Application

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be transferred to Justice Okong'o for consolidation with related matters.
  2. 2 Whether the pending application for enjoinder and the preliminary objection should be heard together before the current court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was a pending application for enjoinder seeking to consolidate this matter with others, but that application had not been prosecuted. Additionally, the respondents' preliminary objection seeking to strike out the suit was also pending. The court determined that it was currently seized of this particular suit and that there was no sufficient basis to transfer the file to another judge. Therefore, the court declined the request for transfer and directed that both the application for enjoinder and the preliminary objection be heard simultaneously before the current court.

Court Disposition

Application for transfer declined; directions issued for simultaneous hearing of pending applications.

Orders

  • The application for transfer of the file to Justice Okong'o is declined.
  • Both the application for enjoinder and the preliminary objection shall be heard simultaneously before this court.