[2023] KEELC 17142 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 17142 (KLR)

The court held that the defence's attempt to introduce additional documents after the close of the plaintiff's case, and without seeking leave of court, was irregular and unacceptable. The court emphasized that proper case management and procedural fairness require all parties to disclose and rely on their evidence...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 17142 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Leebarn Builders Limited; Defendant: Kenya Bankers’ Savings and Credit Co-operative Society Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 371 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Admissibility of Documents During Trial
Outcome
Defence documents listed on February 22, 2023 expunged from the record.
Judges
LN Mbugua
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Evidence, Case Management, Trial Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Admissibility of Evidence Case Management Trial Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leebarn Builders Limited

Plaintiff

Kenya Bankers’ Savings and Credit Co-operative Society Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Admissibility of Documents During Trial

  1. 1 Whether the defence can introduce additional documents after the plaintiff's case has closed without leave of court.
  2. 2 Whether documents filed by the defence on February 22, 2023 should be admitted into the record.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the defence's attempt to introduce additional documents after the close of the plaintiff's case, and without seeking leave of court, was irregular and unacceptable. The court emphasized that proper case management and procedural fairness require all parties to disclose and rely on their evidence at the appropriate stage, and any deviation from this process must be sanctioned by the court. Since the defence did not seek or obtain leave to file further documents, the documents listed on February 22, 2023 were expunged from the record. The court relied on the Supreme Court's guidance in Dande & 3 others v DPP & 2 others, reinforcing the principle that procedural rules...

Court Disposition

Defence documents listed on February 22, 2023 expunged from the record.

Orders

  • The documents allegedly availed by defence in a list dated February 22, 2023 are hereby expunged from the record.