[2025] KECPT 282 (KLR)

[2025] KECPT 282 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that while the Claimant had made a demand for refund and provided some documentation, he had not yet adduced sufficient evidence to conclusively prove his membership status and the amount of deductions. However, recognizing the Tribunal's duty to do substantive justice and not be bound by...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECPT 282 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Fredrick Parsanka Lengou; Respondent: Metropolitan National Sacco Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 781/E684 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Interlocutory Judgment With Directions for Further Evidence
Outcome
Interlocutory judgment with directions for further evidence before final determination.
Judges
BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Sacco Member Refunds, Proof of Membership, Burden of Proof, Civil Evidence
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Banking and Finance Sacco Member Refunds Proof of Membership Burden of Proof Civil Evidence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fredrick Parsanka Lengou

Applicant

Metropolitan National Sacco Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Interlocutory Judgment With Directions for Further Evidence

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant is entitled to a refund of Kshs. 402,168.75 from the Respondent Sacco.
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant has sufficiently proved his claim on a balance of probability.
  3. 3 Whether the Tribunal should grant the refund in the absence of full documentary evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that while the Claimant had made a demand for refund and provided some documentation, he had not yet adduced sufficient evidence to conclusively prove his membership status and the amount of deductions. However, recognizing the Tribunal's duty to do substantive justice and not be bound by technicalities, the Tribunal directed the Claimant to file a Statement of Account and proof of deductions within seven days. The Tribunal reserved final judgment pending receipt of this evidence, emphasizing that the matter would be determined fairly once the necessary documents were provided. The Respondent's financial difficulties were noted but did not negate the obligation to...

Court Disposition

Interlocutory judgment with directions for further evidence before final determination.

Orders

  • Claimant to file Statement of Account and proof of deductions within 7 days from the date of judgment.
  • Final judgment to be delivered on 29.4.2025.