[2025] KECPT 288 (KLR)

[2025] KECPT 288 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had provided credible documentary evidence, specifically a payslip showing deposits of Kshs. 402,168.75 as at December 2021. The Respondent failed to file any substantive evidence or updated statement of account to dispute the Claimant's claim, relying instead on general denials...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECPT 288 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Fredrick Parsanka Lengou; Respondent: Metropolitan National Sacco Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 781/E684 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Judges
BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Sacco Member Deposits, Account Statement Disputes, Monetary Claims
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Sacco Member Deposits Account Statement Disputes Monetary Claims

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fredrick Parsanka Lengou

Applicant

Metropolitan National Sacco Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant is entitled to the sum of Kshs. 402,168.75 as deposits held by the Respondent.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent has provided sufficient proof to dispute the Claimant's claim for the stated amount.
  3. 3 Whether costs and interest should be awarded to the Claimant.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had provided credible documentary evidence, specifically a payslip showing deposits of Kshs. 402,168.75 as at December 2021. The Respondent failed to file any substantive evidence or updated statement of account to dispute the Claimant's claim, relying instead on general denials and reference to an ongoing inquiry. The Tribunal held that in the absence of contrary evidence, the Claimant's claim was proved on a balance of probabilities. Judgment was therefore entered in favour of the Claimant for the sum claimed, together with costs and interest.

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • Judgment is entered in favour of the Claimant against the Respondent for Kshs. 402,168.75.
  • The Respondent shall pay costs of the suit to the Claimant.