[2025] KEHC 7209 (KLR)
The court found that the substantive prayers in the application for bail pending appeal and stay of execution had already been addressed by a previous ruling (Justice D. Kavedza, 30-08-2024), which granted bond to the appellants. As such, the present application was considered spent. The court declined to revisit...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 7209 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Moses Kasaine Lenonkulal; Appellant: Hezbon Jack Wachira Ndathi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal E009 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for Bail Pending Appeal and Stay of Execution
- Outcome
- Application for bail pending appeal and stay of execution is spent; bond terms extended with conditions.
- Judges
- BM Musyoki
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Stay of Execution, Exceptional Circumstances, Bond Terms, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Moses Kasaine Lenonkulal
Appellant
Hezbon Jack Wachira Ndathi
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for Bail Pending Appeal and Stay of Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants are entitled to bail or bond pending the hearing and determination of their criminal appeal.
- 2 Whether the execution of the judgment and sentence should be stayed pending appeal.
- 3 Whether exceptional circumstances exist to justify the grant of bail pending appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the substantive prayers in the application for bail pending appeal and stay of execution had already been addressed by a previous ruling (Justice D. Kavedza, 30-08-2024), which granted bond to the appellants. As such, the present application was considered spent. The court declined to revisit the merits of the bail application, emphasizing judicial restraint and the need to avoid conflicting decisions. However, the court extended the bond terms previously granted, subject to the strict condition that the appellants prosecute their appeal within ninety days, failing which the bond would be cancelled. This approach balanced the appellants' liberty interests with the...
Court Disposition
Application for bail pending appeal and stay of execution is spent; bond terms extended with conditions.
Orders
- The appellants shall continue to enjoy bond terms set by Honourable Justice Dena Kavedza on 30-08-2024 pending hearing and determination of this appeal.
- The appeal shall be prosecuted within the next ninety (90) days from the date of this ruling, failing which the bond terms shall be considered cancelled.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
Lenonkulal & another v Republic (Criminal Appeal E009 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 7209 (KLR) (Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes) (23 May 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 7209 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes
Criminal Appeal E009 of 2024
BM Musyoki, J
May 23, 2025
Between
Moses Kasaine Lenonkulal
1st Appellant
Hezbon Jack Wachira Ndathi
2nd Appellant
and
The Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. This ruling is in respect of the appellant’s application dated 29th August 2024 in which the applicants were praying that; 1. Spent.
2. Pending the inter-parte hearing and determination of the applicant’s petition of appeal, this Honourable Court be pleased to grant the 1st and 2nd applicants herein, Moses Kasaine Lenolkulal and Hesbon Jack Wachira Ndathi bail/bond on such reasonable terms as the court shall deem fit.
3. Pending inter-parte hearing and determination of the applicants’ petition of appeal, this Honourable Court be pleased to grant an order staying/suspending the execution of the judgement and sentence delivered on 28th August 2024 and 29th August 2024 in Nairobi ACCR No 3 of 2019 against the 1st and 2nd applicants herein.
4. This Honourable Court be pleased to issue any orders and direction it deems fit and just.
5. Costs of this application be provided for.
2. The application was supported by affidavit of the Isaac Renee dated 29-08-2024. In the said affidavit, it is deponed that the appeal has high chances of success and that there are exceptional circumstances associated with the health of the applicants which would justify granting of the application.
3. The respondent filed grounds of opposition dated 13th November 2024 and submissions dated submissions 18th November 2024. I have given the applicants two chances to file their submissions but none was filed. I will therefore consider the application without the applicants’ submissions.
4. The respondent has submitted that the appeal will not be rendered nugatory as there is no likelihood of the appellants serving the sentence or substantial part of it before the appeal is heard and determined. It has also submitted that the appeal has no chances of success and even if it had, that fact alone cannot constitute a ground for granting bail pending appeal because all the factors of consideration in such an application which include existence of exceptional circumstances must go together and lack of one of them makes the application non-meritorious. The respondent has also submitted that the appellants can seek medical attention for whatever sickness they have from the prison facilities.
5. I have read the application and the submissions of the respondent. I have given due consideration to the application and agonised over the history of the matter. It is notable that the Honourable Justice D. Kavedza admitted the applicants to bond through her ruling dated 30-08-2024. The application did not have a prayer for bail pending inter-parte hearing of the application as the two substantive prayers were for respective reliefs pending hearing and determination of the appeal. It appears in my opinion that once the bail/bond was granted on 30-08-2024 the application became spent.
6. I do not wish to go into the merits of the appeal at this stage but I discern from the ruling of Honourable Justice D. Kavedza dated 30-08-2024 that it discussed and covered almost all the grounds for an application for bail pending appeal. I must as a matter of principle avoid a situation where I may find myself discussing issues which have already been determined by my predecessor in respect of this application.
7. In the circumstances and noting that the appellants have been out on bond for the last nine months or so and have been attending court religiously, I will extend the bond terms granted on 30-08-2024 on strict condition that the appellants prosecute this appeal within the next ninety (90) days from the date hereof. This will ensure that the appellants do not abuse the discretion extended in their favour by delaying the determination of the appeal.
8. [In the premises I make the following orders; 1. Subject to order 2 below, the appellants shall continue to enjoy bond terms set by Honourable Justice Dena Kavedza on 30-08-2024 pending hearing and determination of this appeal.
2. This appeal shall be prosecuted within the next ninety (90) days failure to which the bond terms set in 1 above shall be considered cancelled.
DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 23RD DAY OF MAY 2025. B.M. MUSYOKIJUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT.Judgment delivered in presence of Mr. Isaac Renee for the appellants and Mr. Mong’are for the respondent.