[2019] KEELC 3448 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 3448 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient and good cause for failing to file the appeal within the prescribed time, specifically due to the delay in obtaining the typed record of the lower court. As the application was unopposed and the reasons advanced were credible, the court exercised its...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 3448 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Leonard Kamenchu Kairiama; Respondent: Elijah Maitai Ichicha; Respondent: The District Land Adjudication and Settlement Officer Tigania Districts; Respondent: The Honourable Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 13 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
Application allowed as drawn; leave granted to file appeal out of time.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Land Adjudication, Appeals Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time Leave to Appeal Out of Time Land Adjudication Appeals Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leonard Kamenchu Kairiama

Applicant

Elijah Maitai Ichicha

Respondent

The District Land Adjudication and Settlement Officer Tigania Districts

Respondent

The Honourable Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient cause to warrant extension of time to file an appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was justified.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient and good cause for failing to file the appeal within the prescribed time, specifically due to the delay in obtaining the typed record of the lower court. As the application was unopposed and the reasons advanced were credible, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application for extension of time. The leave to file the memorandum of appeal out of time was granted, subject to the condition that the memorandum be filed and served within 14 days, failing which the leave would lapse.

Court Disposition

Application allowed as drawn; leave granted to file appeal out of time.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to file and serve the memorandum of appeal within 14 days from the date of this ruling.
  • If the memorandum of appeal is not filed and served within 14 days, the leave granted shall lapse.