[2020] KEELC 1456 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 1456 (KLR)

The court found that the grounds raised in the application pertain to substantive issues that should be determined by the court hearing the main appeal. The court certified the application as urgent and directed that it be placed before the appropriate judge for further directions. The court did not grant the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 1456 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Dr. Leonard Kimeu Mwanthi; Respondent: Rukaria M’Twerandu M’Iringi; Applicant: Nathaniel Kithinji Ikiugu; Applicant: Laban Ndetwa Ngigi; Applicant: Zipporah Nkatha Mbaabu; Applicant: Anne Wanjugu Kariithi; Applicant: Mukindia Samwel Mwirigi
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 92 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Joinder and Stay
Outcome
Application certified urgent and referred to appellate judge; no substantive relief granted at this stage.
Legal Topics
Joinder of Parties, Stay of Execution, Review of Judgment, Land Parcel Exclusion
Source Language
en
Land and Property Joinder of Parties Stay of Execution Review of Judgment Land Parcel Exclusion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr. Leonard Kimeu Mwanthi

Appellant

Rukaria M’Twerandu M’Iringi

Respondent

Nathaniel Kithinji Ikiugu

Applicant

Laban Ndetwa Ngigi

Applicant

Zipporah Nkatha Mbaabu

Applicant

Anne Wanjugu Kariithi

Applicant

Mukindia Samwel Mwirigi

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Joinder and Stay

  1. 1 Whether the intended interested parties should be enjoined in the proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether a stay of execution of the orders issued on 23rd May, 2018 should be granted.
  3. 3 Whether the judgment dated 23rd May, 2018 should be reviewed, varied, or set aside and the matter heard de novo.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the grounds raised in the application pertain to substantive issues that should be determined by the court hearing the main appeal. The court certified the application as urgent and directed that it be placed before the appropriate judge for further directions. The court did not grant the substantive orders sought, such as stay of execution or review of judgment, at this interlocutory stage, emphasizing that prerequisites for such relief, including security for due performance, must be addressed by the appellate court. The application was thus limited to certification of urgency and referral to the appellate judge for determination.

Court Disposition

Application certified urgent and referred to appellate judge; no substantive relief granted at this stage.

Orders

  • The application is certified urgent.
  • The application will be placed before Hon. Justice Lucy Mbugua, ELC Judge at Meru on 19th August, 2020.