[2008] KECA 242 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal found that while the trial judge had considered most relevant factors, she failed to take into account the period the appellant had already spent in custody prior to sentencing. The court held that this omission, combined with the circumstances of the case, rendered the twenty-year sentence harsh...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KECA 242 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Leonard Kyalo Muli; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 51 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- sentence varied; appeal allowed to the extent of reduction of sentence
- Judges
- J Wakiaga
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Sentencing Principles, Mitigating Factors, Excessive Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leonard Kyalo Muli
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of twenty years imprisonment for manslaughter was harsh and excessive in the circumstances.
- 2 Whether the trial judge failed to consider relevant factors, specifically the period the appellant had already spent in custody.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal found that while the trial judge had considered most relevant factors, she failed to take into account the period the appellant had already spent in custody prior to sentencing. The court held that this omission, combined with the circumstances of the case, rendered the twenty-year sentence harsh and excessive. The appellate court therefore set aside the original sentence and substituted it with a sentence of fifteen years imprisonment, to run from the date of conviction and sentencing. The appeal was allowed to this limited extent, with the conviction for manslaughter remaining undisturbed.
Court Disposition
sentence varied; appeal allowed to the extent of reduction of sentence
Orders
- The sentence of twenty years imprisonment is set aside.
- The appellant is sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment from 8th February, 2005.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 51 OF 2006
LEONARD KYALO MULI ……....…………….…...……. APPELLANT
AND
REPUBLIC ……………………………………………. RESPONDENT
(Appeal from a conviction & sentence of the High Court of Kenya
Machakos (Wendoh, J) dated 8th February, 2005
In
H.C. Cr. C. No. 60 of 2004)
**********************
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
The appellant, Leonard Kyalo Muli, who was originally charged with the offence of murder, eventually pleaded guilty to and was convicted of the lesser offence of manslaughter contrary to section 202 as read with section 205 of the Penal Code. The particulars of that charge were that on the 13th day of July, 2003 at Ikaatini Market, Machakos District of the Eastern Province, the appellant unlawfully killed Pius Mutune Katata, “The deceased” hereinafter.
The deceased was the son of one Patrick Matete Mutune (Patrick). On 13th July, 2003, Patrick invited the appellant to his home. The deceased lived with his wife in his father’s home. The appellant had been invited there to help Patrick in the preparation of some herbal medicine. At some stage during the visit, the appellant got involved with the wife of the deceased and the two were caught having sexual intercourse in a bush behind the home. A fight started between the appellant and the deceased, but it would appear that the matter was patched up. Later in the day the deceased and his father went to Kwa Wanjiru Market and the appellant and deceased met again. The appellant was said to have removed his shorts and threw them at the deceased. A quarrel again erupted and the appellant chased the deceased into a bar. The appellant was next seen coming out of the bar carrying a blood-stained knife and the deceased was subsequently found dead there with a stab wound on the chest measuring 2x2 inches. The appellant admitted all these facts and the learned Judge (Wendoh, J) having convicted him sentenced him to twenty years imprisonment. The appellant’s appeal to us now is one of mercy on the basis that the sentence of twenty years imposed on him was harsh and excessive in all the circumstances.
We, of course, have the right to interfere with a sentence such as the one before us if we are satisfied that in coming to that sentence, the Judge did not take into account a relevant factor, or that she took into account an irrelevant factor or that in all the circumstances of the case, the sentence is harsh and excessive.
In this case there can be no doubt that throughout the incident or incidents leading to the death of Pius, the appellant was the guilty party. He had been invited to the home of the deceased and he provoked the deceased beyond endurance by sleeping with the wife of the deceased. When he met the deceased at the market, he was already armed with a knife and chased the deceased into a bar where he stabbed him causing instant death. The learned Judge took all these factors into account. She also took into account the respective ages of the deceased and the appellant. The only relevant thing she appears not to have taken into account was that by the time she was sentencing the appellant on 8th February, 2005, the appellant had been in custody for nearly two years, the offence having been committed on 13th July, 2003. Apart from not taking this relevant factor into account, we think that in all the circumstances of the case, the sentence of twenty years imprisonment was harsh and excessive.
We accordingly allow the appeal against sentence, set aside the sentence of twenty years and substitute therefor a sentence of fifteen (15) years imprisonment to run from 8th February, 2005, that being the date when the appellant was convicted and sentenced. To that limited extent, the appeal succeeds.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 15th day of February, 2008.
R.S.C. OMOLO
…………………….
JUDGE OF APPEAL
P.N. WAKI
……………………..
JUDGE OF APPEAL
W.S. DEVERELL
……………………….
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a
true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR.