[2019] KEHC 12062 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 12062 (KLR)

The court found that the imposition of consecutive sentences in the Applicant's circumstances would result in injustice, particularly given the period already spent in remand custody and the lack of opposition from the prosecution. The court exercised its discretion to consolidate the sentences from the three...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 12062 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Leonard Musembi Mutisya; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 1209 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
LK Kimaru
Legal Topics
Sentencing Principles, Concurrent Sentences, Remand Custody Credit
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Principles Concurrent Sentences Remand Custody Credit

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leonard Musembi Mutisya

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the custodial sentences imposed on the Applicant in different criminal cases should run concurrently or consecutively.
  2. 2 Whether the period spent in remand custody should be considered in determining the effective sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the imposition of consecutive sentences in the Applicant's circumstances would result in injustice, particularly given the period already spent in remand custody and the lack of opposition from the prosecution. The court exercised its discretion to consolidate the sentences from the three criminal cases and ordered that the Applicant serve a single custodial sentence of two years imprisonment, effective from 23rd November 2018, covering all the relevant cases. This approach ensured fairness and compliance with the principles governing concurrent sentencing and consideration of time spent in custody.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The sentences imposed in Criminal Case No.1751 of 2010, Criminal Case No.955 of 2013, and Criminal Case No.1773 of 2013 are consolidated.
  • The Applicant shall serve a sentence of two (2) years imprisonment with effect from 23rd November 2018, covering all the aforementioned cases.