[2021] KEELRC 1756 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 1756 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to prove willful disobedience of the court's orders by the respondents. The evidence showed that Stella Chepkoech Langat had vacated the office of County Secretary as directed, and an acting County Secretary had been appointed. The court further held that the responsibility...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 1756 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Leonard Sigey Bett; Respondent: Governor, County of Bomet; Respondent: County Assembly of Bomet
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 14 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Contempt Application Post Judgment
Outcome
application for contempt dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Public Service Appointments, County Government Procedure, Judicial Orders Enforcement
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Constitutional Law Contempt of Court Public Service Appointments County Government Procedure Judicial Orders Enforcement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leonard Sigey Bett

Applicant

Governor, County of Bomet

Respondent

County Assembly of Bomet

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Contempt Application Post Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondents were in contempt of court orders issued on 17 February 2021 regarding the removal and fresh recruitment of the County Secretary.
  2. 2 Whether the actions taken by the respondents constituted willful disobedience of the court's orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to prove willful disobedience of the court's orders by the respondents. The evidence showed that Stella Chepkoech Langat had vacated the office of County Secretary as directed, and an acting County Secretary had been appointed. The court further held that the responsibility for recruitment of a substantive County Secretary lay with the County Public Service Board, which was not a party to the proceedings. Since the court's judgment did not set specific timelines for recruitment and the relevant appointing authority was not before the court, the threshold for contempt was not met. The application for contempt was therefore dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

application for contempt dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The contempt motion is dismissed with costs to the respondents.