[2018] KECA 852 (KLR)

[2018] KECA 852 (KLR)

The application was unopposed, and the 2nd respondent expressly indicated no objection. The court was satisfied that the applicant had demonstrated merit in the application for extension of time. In the interests of justice and to avoid prejudice, the court exercised its discretion to extend the time for filing and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KECA 852 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Leonardus Odhiambo Okelo; Respondent: Lilian Atieno Odera; Respondent: Maurice Olpens Okoth
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 98 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time and Stay of Execution
Outcome
Application allowed.
Judges
AM Githinji
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Execution, Costs in Appeal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Leave to Appeal Out of Time Stay of Execution Costs in Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leonardus Odhiambo Okelo

Applicant

Lilian Atieno Odera

Respondent

Maurice Olpens Okoth

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time and Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file a notice of appeal and appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant should be granted a stay of execution of costs pending appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The application was unopposed, and the 2nd respondent expressly indicated no objection. The court was satisfied that the applicant had demonstrated merit in the application for extension of time. In the interests of justice and to avoid prejudice, the court exercised its discretion to extend the time for filing and serving the notice of appeal and the record of appeal. The court also directed that costs of the application be costs in the appeal, considering the applicant was unrepresented and to save costs.

Court Disposition

Application allowed.

Orders

  • Time for filing and serving the notice of appeal is extended; notice to be filed and served within 14 days from the date of the ruling.
  • Time for filing and serving the record of appeal is extended; record to be filed and served within 30 days from the date of the ruling.