[2012] KEHC 4334 (KLR)
The court found that the grant issued on 26th July 1991 had become inoperative due to the death of one of the administrators and the failure to confirm the grant within one year as required by law. The court exercised its powers under Section 76(e) of the Succession Act to annul the grant. The court further held that, due to non-compliance with the order of 18th January 2005 requiring documentation to confirm the heirs, it could not issue a fresh grant as requested. The court directed that the rightful heirs are at liberty to petition afresh with all requisite documentation for the court's consideration.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 4334 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Leonida Onyango Oguga; Co Administratrix: Esther Adhiambo Oguga (deceased); Respondent: Daniel Oduor Oguga
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2012
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 34 of 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation and Re Issuance of Grant
- Outcome
- grant annulled; application for fresh grant denied; liberty to petition afresh granted
- Judges
- CN Mugo
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Grant Revocation, Estate Administration
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leonida Onyango Oguga
Applicant
Esther Adhiambo Oguga (deceased)
Co Administratrix
Daniel Oduor Oguga
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation and Re Issuance of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration ad litem should be revoked due to the death of a co-administratrix and lack of confirmation within the statutory period.
- 2 Whether a fresh grant can be issued to the applicant and another beneficiary in light of non-compliance with previous court orders.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the grant issued on 26th July 1991 had become inoperative due to the death of one of the administrators and the failure to confirm the grant within one year as required by law. The court exercised its powers under Section 76(e) of the Succession Act to annul the grant. The court further held that, due to non-compliance with the order of 18th January 2005 requiring documentation to confirm the heirs, it could not issue a fresh grant as requested. The court directed that the rightful heirs are at liberty to petition afresh with all requisite documentation for the court's consideration.
Court Disposition
grant annulled; application for fresh grant denied; liberty to petition afresh granted
Orders
- The grant issued on 26th July 1991 is annulled under Section 76(e) of the Succession Act.
- Prayers for a fresh grant are denied due to non-compliance with the order of 18th January 2005.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment