[2023] KEHC 26236 (KLR)
The court found that the 3rd Respondent, County Executive Member for Finance, County Government of Meru, had willfully and persistently disobeyed court orders to settle the decretal sum and failed to file a payment plan as directed. The court rejected the explanation regarding the change of office holder, holding...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 26236 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Leopard Rock Mico Limited; Respondent: Chief Officer Finance, County Government Of Meru; Respondent: County Secretary County Government Of Meru; Respondent: County Executive Member for Finance County Government Of Meru
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review E003 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Ruling on Contempt and Sentencing
- Outcome
- 3rd Respondent found guilty of contempt; sentenced to fine and imprisonment; warrant of arrest issued.
- Judges
- TW Cherere
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Enforcement of Court Orders, Sanctions for Non Compliance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leopard Rock Mico Limited
Applicant
Chief Officer Finance, County Government Of Meru
Respondent
County Secretary County Government Of Meru
Respondent
County Executive Member for Finance County Government Of Meru
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Contempt and Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 3rd Respondent willfully disobeyed court orders and is in contempt of court.
- 2 Whether the 3rd Respondent should be punished for contempt, and if so, the appropriate sanction.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the 3rd Respondent, County Executive Member for Finance, County Government of Meru, had willfully and persistently disobeyed court orders to settle the decretal sum and failed to file a payment plan as directed. The court rejected the explanation regarding the change of office holder, holding that the obligation to comply with court orders attaches to the office, not the individual. The court emphasized that repeated indulgence had not resulted in compliance and that further delay would undermine the authority of the court. Applying the principles from Shimmers Plaza Limited v National Bank of Kenya Limited and Section 28 of the Contempt of Court Act, the court...
Court Disposition
3rd Respondent found guilty of contempt; sentenced to fine and imprisonment; warrant of arrest issued.
Orders
- The 3rd Respondent is sentenced to pay a fine of KES 200,000 and to serve an imprisonment term of 3 months.
- A warrant of arrest is issued against the 3rd Respondent to be executed by the Officer Commanding Meru Police Station.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
Leopard Rock Mico Limited v Chief Officer Finance, County Government of Meru & 2 others (Judicial Review E003 of 2021) [2023] KEHC 26236 (KLR) (30 November 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 26236 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Meru
Judicial Review E003 of 2021
TW Cherere, J
November 30, 2023
Between
Leopard Rock Mico Limited
Applicant
and
The Chief Officer Finance, County Government Of Meru
1st Respondent
County Secretary County Government Of Meru
2nd Respondent
County Executive Member for Finance County Government Of Meru
3rd Respondent
Ruling
1. On July 20, 2023, this court after hearing advocates for the parties on the applicant’s notice of motion dated August 31, 2022, for committal of the 3rd respondent to jail for contempt made the following orders: By1. The 3rd respondent’s sentencing for contempt of court is suspended 2. 3rd respondent is granted up to 31st July, 2023 to purge the contempt
3. Sentence on 21st, September, 2023 if the contempt will not have been purged4. Costs of the Notice of Motion dated Notice of Motion dated 31st August, 2022 shall be borne by the Respondents
2. When the mater came up on 21st September, 2023, Respondents’ advocate informed the court, that Respondents had paid a sum of KES. 20,000,000/- which payment was subsequently confirmed by Applicant’s counsel on 28th September, 2023. On that same day, Applicant’s counsel conceded to Respondents’ request for time for the parties to agree on the payment plan for the balance of the decretal sum and the sentence was again put off to 12th October, 2023.
3. Come 12th October, 2023, no payment plan had been filed and the court noting that the Respondents had not demonstrated seriousness and good faith in the way they were handling the matter, ordered that the 3rd Respondent attend court for sentencing on 09th November, 2023.
4. On that day, 3rd Respondent was reported to have accompanied the governor for the impeachment hearing before the Senate and the court reluctantly adjourned the sentencing to 30th November, 2023.
5. This morning, Mr. Ashaba stated that the previous CEC Finance Monica Nthiori has been replaced and could not attend court. He also submitted that he has been unable to reach the new CEC Finance to attend court and asked for time for the new CEC Finance to acquaint himself with the matter and also file a payment plan.
6. Mr. Wanyama opposed the application on the grounds that this matter has taken long and that by their failure to file a payment plan, Respondents have not shown any seriousness in settling the matter even though the court has been gracious to allow numerous adjournments in favour of the Respondents
7. I have considered the court record and submissions made before me today.
8. In the case of Shimmers Plaza Limited v National Bank of Kenya Limited [2015] eKLR where the Court of Appeal held as follows;“We reiterate here that court orders must be obeyed. Parties against whom such orders are made cannot be allowed to trash them with impunity. Obedience of court orders is not optional, rather, it is mandatory and a person does not choose whether to obey a court order or not, for as Theodore Roosevelt, the 26th President of the United States of America once said; “No man is above the law and no man is below it; nor do we ask any man’s permission to obey it. Obedience to the law is demanded as a right; not as a favour. The courts should not fold their hands in helplessness and watch as their orders are disobeyed with impunity left, right and centre. This would amount to abdication of our sacrosanct duty bestowed on us by the Constitution. The dignity, and authority of the court must be protected, and that is why those who flagrantly disobey them must be punished, lest they lead us all to a state of anarchy. We think we have said enough to send this important message across.”
9. The record in this matter demonstrates that the 3rd Respondent has shown willful defiance and disrespect towards court orders and continues to refuse to comply inpite of the indulgence on the part of the Applicant and the court.
10. It has not been demonstrated that there is a new office holder in the office of the CEC Finance but even if there was, the orders herein were issued against the officer holding the position of CEC Finance and whether newly appointed or not has no option but to comply and failure to do so is punishable in law.
11. The actions by the Respondents and more particularly the 3rd Respondent leave no doubt in the mind of the court that Respondents and more particularly the 3rd Respondent are undeserving of any further indulgence from this court.
12. Section 28 of the Contempt of Court Act No. 46 of 2016 provides that:(1)Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act or in any other written law, a person who is convicted of contempt of court is liable to a fine not exceeding two hundred thousand shillings or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or to both.
13. The 3rd Respondent having been found guilty of contempt is hereby sentenced to pay a fine of KES. 200,000 and to serve an imprisonment term of 3 months. Since the 3rd respondent is absence, I hereby issue a warrant of arrest to be executed by the Officer Commanding Meru Police Station.
DATED IN MERU THIS 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023WAMAE. T.W. CHEREREJUDGEAppearancesCourt Assistants - Kinoti/MuneneFor Applicant - Mr. Wanyama for Manyonge Wanyama & Associates LLPFor Respondents - Mr. Ashaba for Mutuma & Gichuru Associate AdvocatesFurther Orders.Mention 18thJanuary, 2024 to confirm compliance and for further orders.