[2022] KEELC 1891 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 1891 (KLR)

The court determined that it is necessary to carefully consider all the issues raised in the application before making a decision on whether to recommend the empanelment of a three Judge Bench. The court declined to summarily dismiss the application as urged by the respondents, finding that the issues may require...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 1891 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Leruk Murusi & 12 Others; Respondent: County Government of Marsabit; Respondent: Chief of the Kenya Defence Forces; Respondent: Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Defence; Respondent: Hon. Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Isiolo
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 7 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application for Empanelment of Three Judge Bench
Outcome
Ruling reserved; no final determination on empanelment application at this stage.
Legal Topics
Empanelment of Three Judge Bench, Constitutional Petitions, Land Rights
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Land and Property Empanelment of Three Judge Bench Constitutional Petitions Land Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leruk Murusi & 12 Others

Applicant

County Government of Marsabit

Respondent

Chief of the Kenya Defence Forces

Respondent

Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Defence

Respondent

Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application for Empanelment of Three Judge Bench

  1. 1 Whether the issues raised in the petition warrant the empanelment of a three Judge Bench under Article 165(4) of the Constitution.
  2. 2 Whether the issues before the court are straightforward or raise substantial questions of law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that it is necessary to carefully consider all the issues raised in the application before making a decision on whether to recommend the empanelment of a three Judge Bench. The court declined to summarily dismiss the application as urged by the respondents, finding that the issues may require further scrutiny. Accordingly, the court reserved its ruling on the application and scheduled a date for delivery of the ruling.

Court Disposition

Ruling reserved; no final determination on empanelment application at this stage.

Orders

  • Ruling on the application for empanelment of a three Judge Bench to be delivered on 28th March, 2022.