[2002] KEHC 1054 (KLR)
The court found that it has broad discretionary powers to allow amendments to pleadings at any stage of the proceedings, as long as such amendments do not cause grave injustice to the opposing party. The reasons advanced by the plaintiffs in opposition did not demonstrate any consequential injustice that would...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] KEHC 1054 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Leslie Sringer; Plaintiff: Stanley Jones; Plaintiff: Joan Jones; Defendant: Hassan S. Ismail; Defendant: Ali Sharif Ismail
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 1070 of 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Amend Defence
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Leave to Amend, Discretion of Court
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leslie Sringer
Plaintiff
Stanley Jones
Plaintiff
Joan Jones
Plaintiff
Hassan S. Ismail
Defendant
Ali Sharif Ismail
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Amend Defence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants should be granted leave to amend their statement of defence.
- 2 Whether the proposed amendment would cause injustice to the plaintiffs.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that it has broad discretionary powers to allow amendments to pleadings at any stage of the proceedings, as long as such amendments do not cause grave injustice to the opposing party. The reasons advanced by the plaintiffs in opposition did not demonstrate any consequential injustice that would result from allowing the amendment. Therefore, the application for leave to amend the defence was granted to ensure the real questions in controversy could be determined effectively.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Leave is granted to the defendants to file and serve a new and fresh amended statement of defence within 7 days of this order.
- The plaintiffs shall have 7 days thereafter to file and serve any amended reply if necessary.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
IN THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO.1070 OF 1997
LESLIE SRINGER::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1ST PLAINTIFF
STANLEY JONES ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::2ND PLAINTIFF
JOAN JONES ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::3RD PLAINTIFF
V E R S U S
HASSAN S. ISMAIL :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1ST DEFENDANT
ALI SHARIF ISMAIL::::::::::::::::::::::::::::2ND DEFENDANT
R U L I N G
This is an application by the defendants for leave to amend the defence made under Order 6A Rr 3, 4 and 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A of the Act supporting affidavit by GODFREY JOSIAH LANGI sworn on 4/2/97 and states that having obtained leave to issue 3rd party notice on 31-7-98 and that has necessitated the amendment of the statement of defence to enable court to rightly and conveniently adjudicate on liability.
In reply Mr. Peter Le Pelley counsel for plaintiff has filed his replying affidavit on 25-11-2001 in which he denies that these amendments are necessary at all.
I have heard the learned counsel on this application and looked at the defence annexed and I see that there is no reason to refuse leave to amend.
In principle this court has wide powers under Order 6A of the Civil Procedure Rules to allow any amendment to the pleadings as may be necessary for the purpose of determining the real questions in controversy between the parties, either on application of any of the parties or its own motion. Amendment can be at any stage of the proceedings and the one outstanding bar towards the unfettered discretion is that if the amendment is allowed will cause grave injustice to the opposite party.
The reasons given by the plaintiffs in opposition to this application show no consequential injustice if this is allowed.
I therefore allow the application and order that New and Fresh amended statement of defence be filed and served in 7 days of this order and the plaintiff to have 7 days to file and serve any amended reply to it if necessary. Cost of the application to be cost in the cause.
Dated this 29th day of April 2002
A. I. HAYANGA
J U D G E
Read to Mrs Kirima for plaintiff
N/A for defendant
A. I. HAYANGA
J U D G E