[2019] KEELRC 493 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 493 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the 11-month delay between the delivery of judgment and the filing of the application for leave to appeal out of time. The explanation of loss of a phone was deemed frivolous, as alternative means of communication were available and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 493 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Lewis Faida Mbogo; Respondent: Salim Said t/a Sadin Timber & Wood Products
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 1 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal Out of Time, Work Injury Claims, Judicial Discretion
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeal Out of Time Work Injury Claims Judicial Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lewis Faida Mbogo

Applicant

Salim Said t/a Sadin Timber & Wood Products

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient cause for the delay in filing an appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to grant leave to appeal out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the 11-month delay between the delivery of judgment and the filing of the application for leave to appeal out of time. The explanation of loss of a phone was deemed frivolous, as alternative means of communication were available and not utilized. There was also no evidence of an application for review at the trial court. The court was not persuaded to exercise its discretion in favour of the applicant and dismissed the application.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal out of time is dismissed.
  • There is no order as to costs.