[2004] KEHC 2385 (KLR)
The court found that the Kilifi magistrate's court had jurisdiction to try the employment dispute under Section 40 of the Employment Act. The High Court has discretionary power under Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act to transfer suits, provided the original court had jurisdiction. Considering that all parties...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] KEHC 2385 (KLR)
- Parties
- Defendant: Lewis Nyakundi; Plaintiff: United Touring Co. (K) Ltd.
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 86 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Suit
- Outcome
- Application allowed; suit ordered transferred to Mombasa Resident Magistrate's Court.
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Suits, Jurisdiction of Magistrates, Discretionary Powers, Employment Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lewis Nyakundi
Defendant
United Touring Co. (K) Ltd.
Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Kilifi magistrate's court had jurisdiction to try the employment dispute.
- 2 Whether the High Court has the power to transfer the suit from Kilifi to Mombasa under Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act.
- 3 Whether the balance of convenience and interests of justice warrant the transfer of the suit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Kilifi magistrate's court had jurisdiction to try the employment dispute under Section 40 of the Employment Act. The High Court has discretionary power under Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act to transfer suits, provided the original court had jurisdiction. Considering that all parties reside in Mombasa, the cause of action arose there, and transferring the suit would serve the interests of justice, convenience, and reduce expenses, the court exercised its discretion to order the transfer of the suit from Kilifi to Mombasa Resident Magistrate's Court.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; suit ordered transferred to Mombasa Resident Magistrate's Court.
Orders
- The suit KILIFI RMCC No. 136/2003 is transferred to Mombasa Resident Magistrate's Court for hearing and determination.
- Costs shall be in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA
MISC. CIVIL SUIT NO. 86 OF 2004
LEWIS NYAKUNDI ……………… …………………....DEFENDANT/APPLICANT
VERSUS
UNITED TOURING CO. (K) LTD. ……………………PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT
RULING
By Notice of Motion dated 7-2-2004 the Applicant seeks order for the transfer of Civil suit KILIFI RMCC No. 136/2003 L. Nyakundi –vs- Mitchell Cotts Freight (K) Ltd. now filed in Kilifi surbodinate court to Mombasa court Resident Magistrate’s Court.
The grounds on which the application is made are disclosed in the supporting affidavit mainly that t he suit was filed in Kilifi being mistake of the advocate’s clerk and that although Kilifi court has jurisdiction it would be convenient to have the suit transferred to Mombasa. The application is opposed by the defendant who has filed grounds of opposition stating that no suit can be transferred unless the first court had jurisdiction in the first instance and further the application does not lie under the inherent jurisdiction of the court. The defendant has also filed a Replying Affidavit denying jurisdiction fo the Kilifi court on the ground that it is claimed in the plaint that the cause of action across in Mombasa and the Plaintiff resides in Mombasa. The authority of Kaganyi –vs- Musiramo Sr Udo Udoma Chief Justice of Uganda held that Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act gives a general power of transfer of all suits at any stages of proceedings even by court on its own motion without application of any party and that an order can be made only if the suit has in the first place been instituted in a court with jurisdiction to try it.
The present case arises out of employment contract and under the Employment Act (226) Section 40 all disputes between employer and employee are referred to a magistrate empowered to hold magistrate’s court of the first or second class.
“the magistrate shall have jurisdiction (notwithstanding anything contained in any written law respecting the jurisdiction of th e magistrate to the contrary”
I am of the view that the Kilifi magistrate’s court had jurisdiction to try the present case.
I am also o the view that the High Court has power to order transfer of any case as provided under Section 18 Civil Procedure Act. The power is discretionary.
Referring again to the judgement of Sr Udo Udoma in the above cited case
“the principle matters to be taken into consideration are a balance of convenience, questions of expense, interest of justice and possibilities of undue hardship”.
In the present case it appears all parties reside in Mombasa and it is therefore convenient to have the suit tried here in Resident Magistrate’s Court. The reason why the suit was filed in Kilifi has been explained and has not been challenged. It will be much cheaper also to avoid having to travel to Kilifi court for the trial.
For these reasons, I am convinced that it will be in the interest of justice to allow the application which I hereby do and order the transfer of suit as prayed.
Costs shall be in the cause.
Dated 19th April, 2004.
J. KHAMINWA
JUDGE
Mr. Adoch
No appearance for Respondents.