[2020] KEHC 10119 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 10119 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent's explanation for the delay—counsel's illness and technical hitches with the online filing system—was credible, especially given the court's own awareness of similar difficulties experienced by government institutions during the relevant period. The court accepted that the delay...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 10119 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: LG Electronics Africa Logistics FZE Kenya Branch; Respondent: Commissioner of Domestic Taxes
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tax Appeal E064 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Ruling on Application for Enlargement of Time to File Statement of Facts
Outcome
Application allowed; time for filing Statement of Facts enlarged.
Judges
DAS Majanja
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Statement of Facts Filing, Procedural Compliance
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Tax Law Extension of Time Statement of Facts Filing Procedural Compliance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

LG Electronics Africa Logistics FZE Kenya Branch

Appellant

Commissioner of Domestic Taxes

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tax Appeal / Ruling on Application for Enlargement of Time to File Statement of Facts

  1. 1 Whether the appellant has provided sufficient cause for the enlargement of time to file the Statement of Facts.
  2. 2 Whether technical hitches and counsel's illness constitute valid reasons for delay in filing court documents.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent's explanation for the delay—counsel's illness and technical hitches with the online filing system—was credible, especially given the court's own awareness of similar difficulties experienced by government institutions during the relevant period. The court accepted that the delay was not deliberate or due to negligence, but was occasioned by circumstances beyond the respondent's control. Therefore, the court exercised its discretion to enlarge the time for filing the Statement of Facts and deemed the document as duly filed within time.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; time for filing Statement of Facts enlarged.

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 7th September 2020 is allowed.
  • The Statement of Facts dated 16th July 2020 and filed on 4th August 2020 is deemed as duly filed within time.