[2017] KEHC 2911 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 2911 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had provided sufficient explanation for the delay in filing the appeal and that the failure to appeal within the stipulated time was not deliberate or out of carelessness. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application for leave to appeal out of time.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 2911 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Lilian Tabu (Suing as next friend to Bernard Manya Sanya); Respondent: National Social Security Funds
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Busia
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 57 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Extension of Time, Civil Appeals
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Extension of Time Civil Appeals

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lilian Tabu (Suing as next friend to Bernard Manya Sanya)

Applicant

National Social Security Funds

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal out of time under section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had provided sufficient explanation for the delay in filing the appeal and that the failure to appeal within the stipulated time was not deliberate or out of carelessness. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application for leave to appeal out of time.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to file the intended appeal out of time within 21 days from the date of the ruling.
  • Costs be in the cause.