Limisi v Mathews & 2 others (Environment and Land Case 1227 of 2013) [2026] KEELRC 2177 (KLR) (23 July 2026) (Ruling)
The Court found that the security deposited in the joint interest-earning account had served its purpose because the intended appeal was struck out on 9 May 2025, leaving no pending challenge to the judgment. Since the decretal amount remained unsatisfied and the application was supported by documentary evidence,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEELRC 2177 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff/applicant: Hesbon K. Limisi; 1st Defendant/respondent: Dellilah Achieng Mathews; 2nd Defendant/respondent: Argwings Kodhek Ochiely; 3rd Defendant/respondent: The Chief Land Registrar, Nairobi
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Case 1227 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Court Ruling on Application for Release of Security Held in Joint Interest Earning Account / Post Judgment Application After Conditional Stay of Execution; Appeal Struck Out
- Outcome
- Application allowed
- Judges
- ["LG Kimani"]
- Legal Topics
- Conditional Stay of Execution, Security for Due Performance, Release of Joint Account Funds, Striking Out of Appeal, Satisfaction of Decretal Amount, Unopposed Application
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hesbon K. Limisi
Plaintiff/applicant
Dellilah Achieng Mathews
1st Defendant/respondent
Argwings Kodhek Ochiely
2nd Defendant/respondent
The Chief Land Registrar, Nairobi
3rd Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Court Ruling on Application for Release of Security Held in Joint Interest Earning Account / Post Judgment Application After Conditional Stay of Execution; Appeal Struck Out
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the security deposited pursuant to the stay order should be released after the appeal was struck out.
- 2 Whether the Applicant proved that the funds should be applied towards partial satisfaction of the decree.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the security deposited in the joint interest-earning account had served its purpose because the intended appeal was struck out on 9 May 2025, leaving no pending challenge to the judgment. Since the decretal amount remained unsatisfied and the application was supported by documentary evidence, the funds and accrued interest had to be released to the Plaintiff's advocates for application toward satisfaction of the decree.
Court Disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- Manager, Equity Bank, Mama Ngina Street Branch directed to release the money held in the joint names of Nicholas Odera Sumba Advocate and Duncan Kaigi Maina Advocate in account number 0150187182438, together with all accrued interest, to N.O. Sumba & Company Advocates for application towards satisfaction of the decree.
- The sums released shall be credited towards the decretal amount due to the Plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
 **REPUBLIC OF KENYA** **IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MILIMANI** **E.L.C CASE NO. 1227 OF 2013** **HESBON K. LIMISI………………………….……………….PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT** **VERSUS** **DELLILAH ACHIENG MATHEWS………………….1ST DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT** **ARGWINGS KODHEK OCHIELY………….………2ND DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT** **THE CHIEF LAND REGISTRAR, NAIROBI………..3RD DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT** **RULING** 1. The Plaintiff/Applicant filed the present Notice of Motion seeking an order directing the Manager of Equity Bank, Mama Ngina Street Branch, to release all monies held in the joint interest-earning account in the names of Nicholas Odera Sumba Advocate and Duncan Kaigi Maina Advocate (Account No. 0150187182438) to the firm of N.O. Sumba & Company Advocates. The Applicant also seeks an order that the 2nd Defendant/Respondent bear the costs of the application. 2. The application is premised on the grounds that judgment was entered in favour of the Plaintiff on 6th February 2020 by Justice L. Komingoi. Following the judgment, the 2nd Defendant filed an application dated 3rd March 2020 seeking a stay of execution pending an intended appeal to the Court of Appeal. The Court allowed the application in a ruling delivered on 19th November 2020 on condition that the 2nd Defendant deposit Kshs 200,000 in a joint interest-earning account operated by the advocates for the respective parties. 3. It is the Applicant's case that the conditional deposit was subsequently made on or about 15th December 2020 into the joint account initially held in the names of Maina Rogoi & Company Advocates and N.O. Sumba & Company Advocates and later redesignated in the names of Nicholas Odera Sumba Advocate and Duncan Kaigi Maina Advocate. According to the Applicant, the account presently holds a balance of approximately Kshs. 243,798.34. 4. The Applicant further contends that the funds were deposited solely as security pending the hearing and determination of Nairobi Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. E258 of 2021. However, the said appeal was struck out on 9th May 2025 following an application by the Plaintiff/Respondent, with the result that there is no pending appeal challenging the judgment of this Court. 5. The Applicant states that the decretal amount due from the 2nd Defendant, inclusive of taxed costs and accrued interest, stands at approximately Kshs. 6,377,890.30 and that execution proceedings have already been commenced through a Notice to Show Cause filed before the Court. It is therefore argued that the security deposited pursuant to the stay order has served its purpose and ought to be released to the Plaintiff to be applied towards partial satisfaction of the decretal sum. 6. The application is supported by the affidavit of Nicholas Odera Sumba, learned counsel for the Plaintiff, who reiterates the foregoing facts. He depones that the appeal for which the security was deposited no longer exists following its striking out and that the Plaintiff remains entitled to enforce the decree. Counsel further avers that the continued retention of the funds in the joint account is without legal basis and that it is just and equitable that the monies, together with the accrued interest, be released to the Plaintiff's advocates for application towards settlement of the decretal amount. 7. In support of the application, the Applicant annexes copies of the current bank statement and account opening documents relating to the joint account, the ruling of 19th November 2020 granting conditional stay of execution, the decree, the Certificate of Costs, and the ruling of the Court of Appeal delivered on 9th May 2025 striking out Civil Appeal No. E258 of 2021. **Analysis and Determination** 1. The Court has considered the Notice of Motion, the supporting affidavit, and the annexures thereto. The application is not opposed, there being no replying affidavit or grounds of opposition filed by any of the Respondents. The Respondents were served with the application through their advocate and the mention notice as shown in the affidavits of service by Nicholas Sumba Advocate sworn on 30th March and 31st March 2026. 2. The issue for determination is whether the Applicant has established sufficient grounds for the release of the monies held in the joint interest-earning account established pursuant to the Court's order of 19th November 2020. 3. The record shows that judgment in favour of the Plaintiff was delivered on 6th February 2020. Following the judgment, the 2nd Defendant successfully sought an order for a stay of execution pending appeal. As a condition for the grant of the stay, this Court directed the 2nd Defendant to deposit Kshs 200,000 in a joint interest-earning account operated by the advocates for the respective parties. The purpose of the deposit was therefore purely to provide security for the due performance of the decree pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal. 4. The Applicant has placed before the Court a copy of the ruling of the Court of Appeal showing that Nairobi Civil Appeal No. E258 of 2021 was struck out on 9th May 2025. Consequently, there is no pending appeal against the judgment of this Court. The condition upon which the security was deposited has therefore been spent. Once the appeal ceased to exist, there remained no legal or equitable basis for retaining the deposited funds in the joint account. 5. The Applicant has further demonstrated that the decretal amount remains unsatisfied and that execution proceedings have already been commenced against the 2nd Defendant. The monies held in the joint account constitute security deposited by the judgment debtor and are available to be applied towards satisfaction of the decree now that the stay of execution has effectively come to an end. 6. Although the application is unopposed, the Court is alive to the principle that the absence of opposition does not automatically entitle an applicant to the orders sought. The Court must still be satisfied that the application is well founded in law and supported by evidence. In this case, the Applicant has exhibited the judgment, the ruling granting conditional stay, the decree, the certificate of costs, the Court of Appeal ruling striking out the appeal, and the bank statement showing the funds presently held in the joint account. Those documents adequately establish the factual basis for the orders sought. 7. The Court is satisfied that the security deposited pursuant to the stay order has served the purpose for which it was intended. Since the appeal has been struck out, the Plaintiff is entitled to enjoy the fruits of the judgment, and there is no justification for the continued preservation of the security in the joint account. 8. Accordingly, I find that the Notice of Motion is merited and is hereby allowed on the following terms: 9. **An order is hereby issued directing the Manager, Equity Bank, Mama Ngina Street Branch, to release the money held in the joint names of NICHOLAS ODERA SUMBA ADVOCATE and DUNCAN KAIGI MAINA ADVOCATE in the re-designated account number 0150187182438 Equity Bank, Mama Ngina Street Branch, Nairobi, together with all accrued interest thereon, to the firm of N.O. Sumba & Company Advocates for application towards satisfaction of the decree in this suit.** 10. **The sums so released shall be credited towards the decretal amount due to the Plaintiff.** 11. **There shall be no order as to costs.** **Delivered, dated and signed via Microsoft Teams this 23rd day of July 2026.** **HON. L. G. KIMANI** **JUDGE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT** *The Ruling read in the presence of-* *Sumba for Plaintiff/Applicant* *No appearance for Defendant/Respondent* Bottom of Form