[2010] KEHC 3082 (KLR)
The court found that the preliminary objection was based on a disputed fact—whether the appellant was guilty of contempt—which was the subject of the appeal. Since the appellant's appeal directly challenged the finding of contempt and the resulting committal, it would be improper to deny him a hearing. The court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 3082 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Lincoln Irungu Kamau; Respondent: Charles Muha Kamamia; Respondent: Winfred Wamuyu Muya
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 609 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- preliminary objection overruled
- Judges
- GG Okwengu
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Right of Audience, Preliminary Objection
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lincoln Irungu Kamau
Appellant
Charles Muha Kamamia
Respondent
Winfred Wamuyu Muya
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a contemnor is entitled to a right of audience before the court after committal for contempt.
- 2 Whether the preliminary objection, based on alleged contempt, can bar the appellant from being heard on his application for release.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the preliminary objection was based on a disputed fact—whether the appellant was guilty of contempt—which was the subject of the appeal. Since the appellant's appeal directly challenged the finding of contempt and the resulting committal, it would be improper to deny him a hearing. The court emphasized the importance of not shutting out a litigant, especially where the appeal concerns the very issue of contempt. Therefore, the preliminary objection was overruled, and the appellant was allowed to proceed with the hearing of his application.
Court Disposition
preliminary objection overruled
Orders
- The preliminary objection is overruled.
- The hearing of the amended notice of motion shall proceed on Friday 19th March, 2010.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Appeal 609 of 2009
LINCOLN IRUNGU KAMAU…………………APPELLANT
VERSUS
CHARLES MUHA KAMAMIA…………...1ST RESPONDENT
WINFRED WAMUYU MUYA…………....2ND RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
1. A preliminary objection has been raised to the appellant’s amended notice of motion filed on10th March, 2010 on the ground that the lower court having made a finding of contempt against the appellant, he should be denied a right of audience until he purges his contempt.
2. It was submitted that the orders sought by the appellant for his release would amount to the court upholding the appellant’s violations. It was further submitted that this court having discharged the orders of stay of execution it cannot now consider the application for release of the appellant as it would amount to interfering with the process of execution.
3. In support of his submissions counsel for the respondent cited the following cases:
(i)National Lottery Ltd vs Betting Control & Licensing BoardC.A. No.102 of 1999.
(ii)Leah Agao Onguto vs Central Organization of Trade Unions HCCC. NMo.1846 of 2009.
4. For the appellant it was submitted that a contemnor could only be denied audience prior to his committal, and not after committal. It was submitted that it was necessary to have the appellant released to facilitate the hearing of his application. The court was urged not to deny the applicant an opportunity of approaching the court. It was argued that in any case the applicant would suffer the consequences of the order if his application was to fail.
5. I have considered the preliminary objection. I find that it is based on a disputed fact i.e. whether the appellant has been guilty of contempt of a court order. That was an issue in the lower court in respect of which a finding has been made against the appellant hence his committal to civil jail. The appellant’s appeal pending in this court is precisely with regard to the trial magistrate’s finding that a warrant of arrest should issue against the appellant for his alleged contempt of court. It would not be proper for this court to shut out the appellant without giving him a hearing.
6. Accordingly, I do overrule the preliminary objection and order that the hearing of the amended notice of motion shall proceed onFriday 19th March, 2010.
Dated and delivered this 16th day of March, 2010
H. M. OKWENGU
JUDGE
In the presence of: -
Gitonga & Njenga for the appellant
Mungai for the respondent
Eric - Court clerk