[2013] KEHC 4026 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 4026 (KLR)

The court found that the issues raised in the current suit were directly and substantially in issue in Nyeri HCCC No.14 of 2009, which involved the same parties and was heard and determined by a competent court. The previous suit conclusively determined the distribution of the matrimonial property, including the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 4026 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: L.K.W; Defendant: L.G.K
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 43 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Plaint for Res Judicata
Outcome
application allowed; suit struck out and dismissed as res judicata
Legal Topics
Res Judicata, Matrimonial Property Distribution, Striking Out Pleadings
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Family and Children Res Judicata Matrimonial Property Distribution Striking Out Pleadings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

L.K.W

Plaintiff

L.G.K

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Plaint for Res Judicata

  1. 1 Whether the current suit is barred by the doctrine of res judicata.
  2. 2 Whether the issues raised in the current suit were directly and substantially in issue in Nyeri HCCC No.14 of 2009.
  3. 3 Whether the parties in the current suit are the same as those in the previous suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the issues raised in the current suit were directly and substantially in issue in Nyeri HCCC No.14 of 2009, which involved the same parties and was heard and determined by a competent court. The previous suit conclusively determined the distribution of the matrimonial property, including the property in question. The court held that the current suit is therefore barred by the doctrine of res judicata, as all the requirements under Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act were satisfied. The plaint was struck out and the suit dismissed as an abuse of the court process.

Court Disposition

application allowed; suit struck out and dismissed as res judicata

Orders

  • The plaint dated and filed on 21st February 2012 on behalf of the plaintiff is struck out.
  • The plaintiff's suit is dismissed with no order as to costs.