[2017] KEHC 6834 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 6834 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant is in occupation of the disputed premises and has been paying rent to the 2nd respondent, facts which were not seriously challenged by the respondents. Recognizing the appellant's right of appeal and the risk that execution of the lower court's order would render the appeal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 6834 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Linet Kwatucha Weku; Respondent: Cornelius W. Wamalwa; Respondent: City Council of Nairobi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 210 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
Stay of execution granted pending appeal, conditional on filing the record of appeal within 30 days. Each party to bear own costs.
Judges
A Mbogholi-Msagha
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Appeals Process, Allocation of Municipal Housing, Possession Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Execution Appeals Process Allocation of Municipal Housing Possession Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Linet Kwatucha Weku

Appellant

Cornelius W. Wamalwa

Respondent

City Council of Nairobi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to a stay of execution of the lower court's order pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant has demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of stay of execution.
  3. 3 Whether the appellant's occupation and payment of rent confer any rights pending appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant is in occupation of the disputed premises and has been paying rent to the 2nd respondent, facts which were not seriously challenged by the respondents. Recognizing the appellant's right of appeal and the risk that execution of the lower court's order would render the appeal nugatory, the court exercised its discretion to grant a stay of execution. The stay was made conditional upon the appellant filing the record of appeal within 30 days. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs, reflecting the court's view that both sides had arguable positions regarding the occupation and allocation of the property.

Court Disposition

Stay of execution granted pending appeal, conditional on filing the record of appeal within 30 days. Each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • Stay of execution of the lower court order dated 30th April, 2015 is granted pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
  • The appellant shall file the record of appeal within 30 days from the date of this ruling.