[2023] KEHC 22433 (KLR)
The court found that the respondents failed to discharge their legal and evidentiary burden to prove payment of the decretal sum as required by law. Despite being given several opportunities, the respondents did not file any statement of accounts or provide proof of payment. The applicant's accounts showed a balance...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 22433 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Lirona Construction Limited; Respondent: Francis Maliti (Sued as the then County Executive Committee Member, Finance & Economic Planning- Machakos County Government); Respondent: Grace Munguti (Sued as the County Secretary Of Machakos County Government)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 16 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to applicant; outstanding decretal sum and interest awarded to applicant
- Judges
- FROO Olel
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Mandamus Orders, Execution of Decrees, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lirona Construction Limited
Applicant
Francis Maliti (Sued as the then County Executive Committee Member, Finance & Economic Planning- Machakos County Government)
Respondent
Grace Munguti (Sued as the County Secretary Of Machakos County Government)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents discharged their legal and evidentiary burden to prove payment of the decretal sum to the applicant.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to the outstanding decretal sum and interest as per the decree.
- 3 Whether the respondents' application for more time to settle the decretal sum based on reconciled accounts should be allowed.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondents failed to discharge their legal and evidentiary burden to prove payment of the decretal sum as required by law. Despite being given several opportunities, the respondents did not file any statement of accounts or provide proof of payment. The applicant's accounts showed a balance of Kshs 6,111,294.55 remaining unpaid. The court held that the applicant is entitled to the outstanding sum together with interest at court rates as stipulated in the decree. The respondents' application for more time was dismissed, and costs were awarded to the applicant.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to applicant; outstanding decretal sum and interest awarded to applicant
Orders
- Respondents to pay the applicant Kshs 6,111,294.55 with interest at court rates as per the decree dated November 4, 2019.
- Application dated April 20, 2022 is dismissed with costs to the applicant assessed at Kshs 30,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
Lirona Construction Limited v Maliti (Sued as the then County Executive Committee Member, Finance & Economic Planning- Machakos County Government) & another (Miscellaneous Application 16 of 2020) [2023] KEHC 22433 (KLR) (21 September 2023) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 22433 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Machakos
Miscellaneous Application 16 of 2020
FROO Olel, J
September 21, 2023
Between
Lirona Construction Limited
Exparte Applicant
and
Francis Maliti (Sued as the then County Executive Committee Member, Finance & Economic Planning- Machakos County Government)
1st Respondent
Grace Munguti (Sued as the County Secretary Of Machakos County Government)
2nd Respondent
Judgment
Introduction 1. The exparte applicant/Respondent had filed proceedings as against the county Government of Machakos and following successful mediation process they obtained a decree in their favour for the sum of Kshs 8,824,690/= in Machakos CMCC No 718 of 2017; Lirona Construction Limited Vrs Machakos Government and the county secretary of Machakos county Government.
2. Further the exparte applicant did institute this judicial review proceedings and the court did on September 24, 2020 issued an order of Mandamus compelling the Respondents to pay the afore-stated sum together with all accruing interest accrued at court rates arising out of the court decree dated November 4, 2020 issued in Machakos CMCC No 718 of 2017; Lirona Construction Limited Vrs Machakos Government and the county secretary of Machakos county Government.
3. When pressed for payment, the Respondents filed an application dated April 20, 2022 seeking for accounts to be taken and they be granted more time to settle the decretal sum based on the said reconciled accounts. Vide a ruling dated October 18, 2022 the said application was allowed and the Honourable Judge did direct that;a.The parties do within 10 days of the said decision, agree on and appoint an independent accountant to take accounts between them and file his/her report within 45 days from the date of his appointment.b.In default of such an agreement each party to appoint an accountant and the two appointed accountants to appoint an umpire and the three to go through the documents in possession of the parties and prepare a report for filing in this matter within 45 days of the appointment of the umpire.c.Where the parties agree on one accountant his/her costs will be shared equally by the parties. Where one party does not cooperate in the process of appointment of the accountant, the report of the accountant appointed by the other party shall be filed for consideration by the court.d.However, where three accountants are appointed each party will bear the costs of his accountant, while the costs of the umpire will be shared equally by the parties.e.Further orders were to await filing of the said Report.
4. Pursuant to the said Order/directions issued by court, the Ex parte Applicant did file their accounts report dated 18th January 2023 wherein it was indicated that they had been paid a sum of Kshs 2,713,395. 45 leaving a balance of Kshs 6,111,294. 55/=. The Respondents/ applicants despite being given several opportunities by the court failed to file their statement of accounts in court to show what they disputed and/or had paid the Ex parte applicant and had not been considered.
5. The Respondents/applicants had the legal burden to prove that they had paid the Ex parte applicant a substantial part of the decretal sum and/or that they had paid the entire decretal sum. By failing to provide proof of payment, they have obviously failed to discharge the legal and evidentiary burden placed on them by section 107 and 108 of the Evidence Act, Cap 80 laws of Kenya. This application thus fails.
Disposition 6. I do find that the Respondent owes the ex parte applicant a sum of Kshs 6,111,294. 55/ arising from the decree issued in Machakos CMCC No 718 of 2017 Lirona Construction Limited Vrs Machakos county Government and the county secretary of Machakos county Government and the same will be paid with interest at court rates as stipulated in the said decree dated November 4, 2019.
7. The application dated April 20, 2022 is hereby dismissed with costs to the ex parte Applicant and the same is assessed at Kshs 30,000/=.
8. It is so ordered.
JUDGEMENT WRITTEN, DATED AND SIGNED AT MACHAKOS THIS 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023. FRANCIS RAYOLA OLELJUDGE