[2008] KEHC 3761 (KLR)
The court found that the defendant/respondent had failed to comply with the judgment requiring subdivision and transfer of the suit land in the specified ratio. The defendant did not oppose the application or provide any explanation for non-compliance. To give effect to its earlier judgment and ensure enforcement,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 3761 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Livirin Kithinji; Defendant: Samuel Mwirigi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 33 of 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Post Judgment Application for Execution of Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Executive Officer authorized to execute transfer documents on behalf of defendant.
- Judges
- SP Ouko
- Legal Topics
- Beneficial Interest, Succession, Transfer of Land, Execution of Judgment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Livirin Kithinji
Plaintiff
Samuel Mwirigi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Post Judgment Application for Execution of Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Executive Officer of the court should be authorized to sign transfer instruments on behalf of the defendant to effect the court's judgment.
- 2 Whether the defendant's failure to comply with the court order justifies ex parte grant of the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the defendant/respondent had failed to comply with the judgment requiring subdivision and transfer of the suit land in the specified ratio. The defendant did not oppose the application or provide any explanation for non-compliance. To give effect to its earlier judgment and ensure enforcement, the court exercised its discretion under the Civil Procedure Act to authorize the Executive Officer to execute all necessary transfer documents on behalf of the defendant/respondent. This ensures that the plaintiff/applicant receives the portion of land awarded by the court, upholding the principle that court orders must be obeyed and enforced.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Executive Officer authorized to execute transfer documents on behalf of defendant.
Orders
- The Executive Officer, Meru High Court, shall execute on behalf of the defendant/respondent all transfer documents necessary to facilitate the transfer of parcel of land No. Nkuene/Kathera/37 measuring 0.48 Ha in the ratio of 40:60 between the plaintiff/applicant and defendant/respondent.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MERU
Civil Case 33 of 2001
LIVIRIN KITHINJI ……………………………………… PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
SAMUEL MWIRIGI …………………………………. DEFENDANT
RULING
The suit brought by way of originating summons by the plaintiff/applicant concerned Nkuene/Kathera/37 (the suit land) registered in the name of the defendant/respondent. The main question in the originating summons was whether the plaintiff/applicant had any beneficial interest in the suit land by reason that he is a natural son of the deceased, M’Ndegwa Baitanyai. That question was resolved in this court’s judgment (Sitati, J) delivered on 17th May 2006 in favour of the plaintiff/applicant as follows:-
“In the result, I do enter judgment for the plaintiff but to the extent of only forty (sic) (40) points out of land parcel number Nkuene/Kathera/37 measuring 0. 48 Ha or thereabout. Accordingly, I order that certificate of succession being P exhibit 2, be duly amended to show that the suit land shall be shared in the ratio of 60 points to 40 points between the defendant and the plaintiff respectively.”
The plaintiff/applicant has now brought the present application arguing that the defendant/respondent has refused to sign the necessary documents to effect the above order.
For that reason, he is seeking that the Executive Officer of this court be authorized to sign the transfer instruments in accordance with the judgment of the court.
I have reproduced in the foregoing paragraph the exact order issued as to how the suit land was expected to be shared out. I have not had the benefit of hearing from the defendant/respondent as to the difficulty, if any, why he has not complied with the order of the court. Twice he was represented in court by counsel, Mr. Ringera, who it was hoped would file a replying affidavit or appear on the day this application was canvassed, but failed to do any of this. This application was therefore unopposed and heard exparte.
The defendant/respondent has not challenged the decision of this court. In order to give effect to that judgment and in exercise of my discretionary powers, I order that the Executive Officer, Meru High Court shall execute, on behalf of the defendant/respondent all transfer documents necessary to facilitate the transfer of parcel of land No. Nkuene/Kethera/37 measuring 0. 48 Ha in the ratio of 40:60, plaintiff/applicant and defendant/respondent.
I make no orders as to costs.
Dated and delivered at Meru this …8th….day of February 2008.
W. OUKO
JUDGE