[2023] KEHC 1395 (KLR)
The court found that the certificate of taxation for KES 29,493,406 had not been set aside or altered and that the respondent did not dispute the retainer, oppose the bill of costs, or respond to the application. Under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the certificate is final as to the amount of costs, and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 1395 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: LJA Associates LLP; Respondent: IVRCL Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application E291 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Advocate's Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
- Outcome
- application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs with interest and costs
- Judges
- PN Gichohi
- Legal Topics
- Advocate Remuneration, Certificate of Taxation, Judgment on Taxed Costs, Execution of Costs, Interest on Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LJA Associates LLP
Applicant
IVRCL Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Advocate's Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the taxed costs as per the certificate of taxation.
- 2 Whether interest at 14% per annum is payable on the taxed costs from the expiration of one month after service of the bill.
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to execute against the respondent for the taxed sum.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the certificate of taxation for KES 29,493,406 had not been set aside or altered and that the respondent did not dispute the retainer, oppose the bill of costs, or respond to the application. Under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the certificate is final as to the amount of costs, and the court is empowered to enter judgment for the sum certified. The court also applied paragraph 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order, allowing interest at 14% per annum from one month after service of the bill. Accordingly, the court entered judgment for the applicant for the taxed sum with interest and granted leave to execute, with costs to the applicant.
Court Disposition
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs with interest and costs
Orders
- Judgment entered in favour of the applicant against the respondent in the sum of KES 29,493,406 together with interest at 14% per annum calculable after 30 days from the date of service until payment in full.
- The applicant is allowed to execute the judgment against the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
LJA Assocates LLP v IVRCL Limited (Miscellaneous Application E291 of 2021) [2023] KEHC 1395 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (23 February 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 1395 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts Commercial and Tax Division)
Commercial and Tax
Miscellaneous Application E291 of 2021
PN Gichohi, J
February 23, 2023
Between
LJA Assocates LLP
Applicant
and
IVRCL Limited
Respondent
Ruling
1. Before this court is a Notice of Motion dated January 18, 2022 brought under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, rule 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order and sec 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act. The advocate/applicant seeks orders that judgment be entered against the client/respondent for the sum of ksh 29,493,406/- in terms of the certificate of taxation dated July 22, 2021 together with interest from June 10, 2021 until payment in full. He also prays that the applicant be at liberty to execute the same against the respondent and that the costs of the application be borne by the respondent.
2. The grounds thereof are that the client/respondent instructed the advocate/applicant to act for it in issuing legal advice in relation to a sub- contract that was being tendered by the respondent to Afrikon worth USD 13,681,825. The applicant then filed a bill of costs on April 20, 2021 which was unopposed and duly taxed. The respondent did not dispute the retainer and the bill remain unsettled.
3. Joseph Ndondo advocate swore an affidavit on January 18, 2022 in support of the application and basically reiterating the grounds on the application. Miss Dave advocate for the applicant opted not to file any submissions but to rely on the said application and affidavit in support.
Determination 4. I have considered this application. There is certificate of taxation for ksh 29,493,406/- and the respondent did not challenge it. It has not been set aside or altered by this court. Though served, the respondent did not file any response and did not attend this court either. Under section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act:-“The certificate of the taxing officer by whom any bill has been taxed shall, unless it is set aside or altered by the court, be final as to the amount of the costs covered thereby, and the court may make such order in relation thereto as it thinks fit, including, in a case where the retainer is not disputed, an order that judgment be entered for the sum certified to be due with costs.”
5. This position of law has be settled by courts. It was emphasised in Lubulellah & Associates Advocates v N K Brothers Limited[2014] eKLR where the court held ;“The law is very clear that once a taxing master has taxed the costs, issued a certificate of costs and there is no reference against his ruling or there has been a ruling and a determination made and not set aside and/or altered, no other action would be required from the court save to enter judgment. An applicant is not required to file suit for the recovery of costs. The certificate of costs is final as to the amounts of the costs and the court would be quite in order to enter judgment in favour of the applicant against the respondent herein for the taxed sum indicated in the certificate of taxation that was issued on November 25, 2012. ”
6. The certificate of taxation issued on January 10, 2022 and has not been set aside or altered by this court. Under paragraph 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order, “An advocate may charge interest at 14 per cent per annum on his disbursements and costs, whether by scale or otherwise, from the expiration of one month from the delivery of his bill to the client, provided that such claim for interest is raised before the amount of the bill shall have been paid or tendered in full.”
7. Putting those factors into consideration, the application is allowed in the following terms;1. Judgment be and is hereby entered in favour of the applicant as against the respondent in the sum of ksh 29,493,406/- together with interest thereon at fourteen (14%) per cent per annum calculable after thirty (30) days from the date when the application was served upon the respondent until payment in full.2. The applicant is allowed to execute the same as against the respondent.3. Costs awarded to the applicant.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT KISII THIS 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023. PATRICIA GICHOHIJUDGEIn the presence of:Mr Riri for Dave for appellants/applicantsN/A for the respondentIsindu court assistant