[2019] KEELC 3817 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 3817 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff and defendant, formerly married under Kikuyu Customary Law, jointly acquired the suit land. Following the defendant's default on a loan secured by the land, the plaintiff settled the debt on condition that the land be transferred to her. This arrangement was formalized by a consent...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 3817 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: LMM; Defendant: JMT
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 260 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiff
Judges
A Ombwayo
Legal Topics
Matrimonial Property, Customary Law Marriage, Land Ownership Disputes, Eviction, Injunctions
Source Language
en
Land and Property Family and Children Matrimonial Property Customary Law Marriage Land Ownership Disputes Eviction Injunctions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

LMM

Plaintiff

JMT

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is the legal and/or registered owner of Eldoret Municipality/Block [xxxx].
  2. 2 Whether the defendant has any legal right to occupy or trespass on the suit land after the consent and transfer.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to orders of eviction and permanent injunction against the defendant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff and defendant, formerly married under Kikuyu Customary Law, jointly acquired the suit land. Following the defendant's default on a loan secured by the land, the plaintiff settled the debt on condition that the land be transferred to her. This arrangement was formalized by a consent order in Eldoret High Court Civil Case No. 24 of 2005 (OS), which was adopted as an order of the court. The property was subsequently registered in the plaintiff's name. After the dissolution of the marriage, the defendant had no legal right to occupy or interfere with the suit land. The defendant's continued presence and threats constituted trespass and violated the...

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • An order of removal and/or eviction of the defendant from the suit land.
  • An order of permanent injunction restraining the defendant, his agents, servants, relatives and/or assignees from trespassing onto the said parcel of land.