[2018] KEHC 2310 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant was entitled to entry of judgment for the certified costs because the respondent had neither filed a reference within the stipulated period nor obtained a stay order from any court. The respondent's mere indication of an intention to appeal, without evidence of a filed appeal or...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 2310 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: L.N. Momanyi & Company Advocates; Respondent: Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 606 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Entry of Judgment on Certificate of Costs
- Outcome
- judgment entered for applicant
- Judges
- RB Ngetich
- Legal Topics
- Advocate Client Costs, Certificate of Costs, Entry of Judgment, Stay of Execution, Appeals Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L.N. Momanyi & Company Advocates
Applicant
Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Entry of Judgment on Certificate of Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to entry of judgment based on the certificate of costs issued by the taxing master.
- 2 Whether the respondent's indication of an intended appeal or objection operates as a stay to bar entry of judgment.
- 3 Whether there is any legal basis to preclude the court from entering judgment in the absence of a filed reference, appeal, or stay order.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was entitled to entry of judgment for the certified costs because the respondent had neither filed a reference within the stipulated period nor obtained a stay order from any court. The respondent's mere indication of an intention to appeal, without evidence of a filed appeal or stay, did not operate as a bar to the applicant's right to judgment. The court emphasized that the statutory procedure under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act allows for entry of judgment on certified costs unless there is a pending reference or stay. As no such impediment existed, judgment was entered for the applicant for the amount certified, with interest from the date of...
Court Disposition
judgment entered for applicant
Orders
- Judgment is entered for the plaintiff against the defendant for KES 987,320.00.
- Interest on the above sum at court rates from 29th June 2017.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
35 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
COMMERCIAL AND ADMIRALTY DIVISION-MILIMANI
HCC APPEAL NO.606 OF 2017
L.N.MOMANYI & COMPANY ADVOCATES……PLAINTIFF/APPL
VERSUS
KENYA MARINE AND FISHERIES....................DEFENDANT/RESP
RESEARCH INSTITUTE...............................2ND DEFENDANT/RESP
R U L I N G
This is a ruling on the Advocate’s application dated 28th August 2018. It seeks entry of judgment for the Applicant against the Respondent for Kenya shillings Nine Hundred and Eighty seven Three Hundred and Twenty Shillings (987,320) plus interest at Courts rate from 29th June 2017.
Grounds On the face Of the Application are that the Taxing Master delivered a ruling on Advocate/Client Bill of Costs for Kenya shillings Nine Hundred and Eighty Seven Three Hundred and Twenty Shillings (987,320) on 16th June 2017.
That Certificate of Costs was issued on 29th June 2017 which the Respondent has failed to satisfy the Certificate of Costs.
The application is supported by affidavit sworn by Lucy Nyamoita Momanyi Advocate. She restated grounds on the face of the application.
Counsel averred that the Respondent was served with Certificate of Costs on 3rd July 2017 but to date the Advocates fee has not been paid.
The Respondent filed grounds of opposition dated 21st September 2018 and filed on 22nd September 2018.
In response the Respondent indicated that it lodged appeal against the ruling delivered by this Court on 30th May 2018.
That the hearing of this application is miscarriage of justice as the Respondent will be denied the right to appeal.
On perusal of the file, I have not seen copy of Memorandum of Appeal. There is also no stay order either from this Court or from Court of Appeal.
In the application dated 10th July 2017, the Respondent sought leave to lodge objection to ruling delivered by the taxing master on 16th June 2017.
The Court dismissed the application by ruling delivered on 30th may 2017. On the said date, the Respondent sought and granted leave to appeal against the ruling.
The Respondent has not demonstrated to Court that appeal was filed; neither has the Respondent sought stay pending appeal.
Upon issuance of Certificate of Costs, a party awarded cost is required to make an application under Section 51(2) of Advocates Act for entry of judgment as per the certified costs.
What can stay the process of seeking judgment for certified costs is a reference if filed by aggrieved party. The Respondent filed no reference within stipulated period. No appeal against ruling on extension of time has been filed nor stay order obtained.
There is no reason to preclude the Court from entering judgment for the Applicant to allow Applicant pursue payment of costs awarded.
Final Order
1. Judgment is hereby entered for the Plaintiff against the defendant for sum of Kenya Shillings Nine Hundred and Eighty Seven Thousand, Three Hundred and Twenty Shillings only (987,320. 00)
2. Interest on order 1 above at Courts rate from 29th June 2017.
Ruling Delivered, DatedandSignedatNairobithis19thday ofNovember, 2018
………………………………
RACHEL NGETICH
JUDGE
IN THE PRESENCE OF
Jasmine: COURT ASSISTANT
Ms. Lucy Momanyi:COUNSEL FOR ADVOCATE/APPLICANT
Mr. Alex Kadimo:COUNSEL FOR CLIENT/RESPONDENT