[2020] KEHC 6813 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 6813 (KLR)

The court found no sufficient reason to interfere with the sentences imposed by the trial court, despite the ongoing COVID-19 crisis. The sentences were lawful, not excessive, and were to run concurrently. The applicant's circumstances did not justify revision, and the court exercised its discretion to deny the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 6813 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Loboku Lekupuny; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nanyuki
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 74 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Order on Revision
Outcome
Revision denied.
Legal Topics
Stealing, Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm, Sentencing, Criminal Revision
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Stealing Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm Sentencing Criminal Revision

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Loboku Lekupuny

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Order on Revision

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed by the trial court should be revised in light of the circumstances, including the COVID-19 crisis.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found no sufficient reason to interfere with the sentences imposed by the trial court, despite the ongoing COVID-19 crisis. The sentences were lawful, not excessive, and were to run concurrently. The applicant's circumstances did not justify revision, and the court exercised its discretion to deny the application for revision.

Court Disposition

Revision denied.

Orders

  • The application for revision is denied.